Sentence examples for right of attribution from inspiring English sources

With no right of attribution, the motion argues there are no legal grounds for Mallon to claim that his name should be added to the PLOS Biology paper.

Moreover, the motion states that while the Copyright Act gives owners some rights, including reproducing and distributing a piece of work or preparing derivative works, "with the exception of visual arts, the right of attribution simply doesn't exist under U.S. copyright".

If the author specifies a pseudonym or some other form of identification when asserting the right of attribution, that form of identification should be adopted.

It seems that at least the failure to accord songwriters their moral right of attribution could be fixed in the regulations without need of amending the Copyright Act by requiring the collection and display of songwriter credits at least if those credits are part of a copyright registration.

They must protect these twin rights, i.e. pass laws or regulations that ensure that private non-State parties do not violate the rights, including a right of attribution of data contributors or producers.

Many governments are less willing than the United States to excuse putatively infringing activities as "fair uses" and more willing than the United States to protect artists' rights to integrity (i.e., to prevent the destruction or mutilation of their creations) and rights of attribution (i.e., to be given credit for their creations).

These are the right to attribution of authorship and the right to control the integrity of one's work as protected by copyright law.

But, privacy advocates find it troubling that the fine-print on the PIC's website says it can use activity data "without limitation in advertising, fundraising and other communications in support of PIC and the principles of the Democratic party, without any right of compensation or attribution".

The right suggests the need for recognition of attribution for data producers and contributors, and perhaps also intellectual property rights.

The concern is properly understood as one that the prodigality of rights attributions is damaging to the cause of rights.

If you've got the story wrong, that kind of attribution isn't going to make it right.