reviewer feedback

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewer feedback" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to comments or evaluations provided by a reviewer, often in the context of academic papers, articles, or projects. Example: "After receiving the reviewer feedback, we made several revisions to improve the quality of our manuscript."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

This session provides an overview of strategies to consider when preparing an NIH R01 proposal, preliminary steps and timeline, components of the application, review criteria, what happens in the review process, reviewer feedback, and re-submission.

University of Chicago

And the publisher is continuing "to consider some form of open review as an option for the future, in response to author and reviewer feedback," Kiermer says.

Science Magazine

How should you respond to reviewer feedback?

The Guardian

Don't respond to reviewer feedback as soon as you get it.

The Guardian

You'll receive your score and reviewer feedback a few months after you submit your application.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

For now, we recommend that the practice is encouraged while the scientific community assesses whether and how author characteristics, such as ethnicity and country of origin, influence reviewer feedback.

Nature

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Discuss reviewers' feedback – see what others think of it.

The Guardian

We incorporated our reviewers' feedback which, for some of us, meant a total upheaval of our content.

Cornell University

When you resubmit your article include this in your report to the journal, specifying how you have responded to the reviewers' feedback.

The Guardian

8) Analyse reviewers' feedback on your submission What exactly are they asking you to do? Work out whether they want you to add or cut something.

The Guardian

Mr MC Senior Research Fellow Health Economicsics), wrote the paper which was amended in the light of co-authors and peer reviewers feedback.

BMC Nephrology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When addressing “reviewer feedback”, prioritize points raised by multiple reviewers or those central to the core argument of your work.

Common error

Don't dismiss feedback that appears repeatedly across different reviewers. This usually indicates a fundamental issue needing attention.

Linguistic Context

The phrase “reviewer feedback” functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes information provided by reviewers, such as comments or evaluations, on a submitted work, as illustrated in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

55%

Academia

35%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, “reviewer feedback” is a commonly used noun phrase that refers to the evaluations and suggestions provided by reviewers, particularly in academic and scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. When dealing with “reviewer feedback”, focus on addressing the core concerns raised, especially those that appear repeatedly. By carefully considering and responding to this feedback, you can significantly improve the quality and impact of your work. Some alternatives are "peer review comments" or "editorial feedback".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

peer review comments

Replaces 'reviewer' with 'peer', emphasizing the collegial aspect of the review process.

editorial feedback

Broader term including comments from editors in addition to or instead of reviewers.

constructive criticism

Focuses on the helpful nature of the feedback, implying it aims to improve the work.

reviewers' suggestions

Highlights the actionable recommendations provided by reviewers.

evaluation comments

A more formal term emphasizing the evaluative aspect of the feedback.

assessment feedback

Similar to evaluation comments, but may apply to a broader range of assessments.

expert appraisal

Highlights the expertise of the reviewer providing the assessment.

report assessment

Focuses on the formal report that contains the feedback.

referee's report

Emphasizes the role of the reviewer as a referee in the publication process.

external review

Indicates the feedback comes from outside the author's immediate circle.

FAQs

How should I respond to “reviewer feedback”?

Carefully consider each point, address them systematically in your revisions, and provide a detailed response to the editor explaining your changes.

What does “reviewer feedback” typically include?

It often includes suggestions for improving clarity, addressing methodological concerns, and strengthening the overall argument of a paper or proposal. Some times, it may refer to "editorial feedback".

Is all “reviewer feedback” valid?

While most “reviewer feedback” is intended to be helpful, some comments may be subjective or misinterpret your work. It's important to evaluate feedback critically and justify your decisions in your response to the editor.

What if I disagree with the “reviewer feedback”?

You can respectfully disagree with a reviewer's comments, but you must provide a clear and well-reasoned justification for your position. This can also happen with "peer review comments".