editorial feedback

USAGE SUMMARY

Editorial feedback is correct and usable in written English.
It can refer to a response from an editor, reviewer, or other critic about a piece of writing. For example, "My professor's editorial feedback greatly improved my term paper."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Special thanks to Bruce Herbert, Richard Liroff, and Julie Gorte for essential editorial feedback.

Harvard University

That's a pretty terrifying piece of editorial feedback to get six weeks before your Edinburgh fringe runs starts, but it turned out to be very easy.

The Guardian - Books

It was the first of its kind – a manuscript assessment agency offering detailed editorial feedback to anyone writing in English anywhere in the world.

The Guardian - Books

It uses the internet to obtain editorial feedback from a large number of volunteers in order to help executives decide which manuscripts should become books.Media Predict hopes to do this using a virtual stockmarket for unpublished books, unsigned music acts and proposed television shows.

The Economist

JC, CB, and AI provided editorial feedback and review.

International Journal of STEM Education

SL created tables, figures, and provided editorial feedback.

International Journal of STEM Education

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

As part of the application process, the AMA CPT editorial panel provides feedback to the applicant.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

In addition to the changes in response to editorial and reviewers' feedback described above, we have also revised our supplementary information according to the discussion we had with the eLife editorial office.

eLife

Solicit feedback on editorial topics and your content plan from your regional and local teams.

The Guardian

In a series of follow-up questions Warren sent to Litan after the hearing, she said he disclosed that Capital Group also provided feedback and editorial comments on a draft.

The Guardian

Ann S. Moore, the president of the People division of Time Inc. -- the group that includes People, People en Espanol, Teen People and In Style -- said that the magazine, the first to be introduced after the merger announcement two months ago, would use AOL as a promotional platform and also look to AOL members for feedback on editorial content.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always consider "editorial feedback" as a valuable opportunity to refine your work, even if the suggestions are difficult to accept. A fresh perspective can significantly improve the final product.

Common error

Don't view "editorial feedback" as a personal attack. It is intended to improve your work, not to criticize your abilities. Focus on the specific suggestions and how you can implement them to enhance your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "editorial feedback" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to the information received from editors, reviewers, or other figures involved in the editorial process, used to improve a piece of writing. Ludwig AI confirms this via its example sentences.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "editorial feedback" is a common term used across various fields, including academia, science, and news media, to describe the process of receiving and incorporating suggestions to improve written work. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. Receiving "editorial feedback" can be a valuable opportunity to refine your work, as the suggestions, while sometimes difficult to accept, provide a fresh perspective that can significantly improve the final product. Understanding and applying this feedback effectively is essential for enhancing the quality and clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

editorial suggestions

Emphasizes advice specifically from an editor regarding improvements.

manuscript review

Focuses specifically on the evaluation of a manuscript, often before publication.

peer review comments

Highlights the feedback received from peers or experts in a specific field.

reviewer's suggestions

Emphasizes the actionable advice provided by a reviewer.

constructive criticism

Indicates feedback that is intended to improve the work, often focusing on areas needing improvement.

content revision guidance

Focuses on the direction and support provided for revising content.

writing critique

Highlights the evaluation and detailed analysis of writing quality.

publication feedback

Refers to commentary and advice related to getting something published.

content assessment

Focuses on the evaluation of the quality and suitability of content.

revision notes

Highlights specific annotations and comments aimed at improving a document.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "editorial feedback" to improve my writing?

Start by understanding the main points, then prioritize the most impactful suggestions. Seek clarification on unclear comments and implement the changes strategically, focusing on overall improvement.

What's the difference between "editorial feedback" and peer review?

"Editorial feedback" usually comes from an editor focused on style and clarity, whereas peer review /s/peer+review focuses on the accuracy and validity of the content, usually by experts in the field.

How to ask for "editorial feedback"?

Be clear about your objectives and provide context, highlight your areas of concern, and demonstrate openness to suggestions. This ensures the /s/editor understands your goals and can provide useful guidance.

What are the key elements of constructive "editorial feedback"?

Constructive "editorial feedback" should be specific, actionable, and focused on improvement. It should identify both strengths and weaknesses, and provide clear suggestions for revisions.