"peer review comments" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in academic or professional settings, where a piece of work is being evaluated by a group of peers. Example: After submitting my research paper, I received valuable feedback from my peers during the peer review process. I took their peer review comments into consideration and made revisions to strengthen my paper before submitting it for publication.
Retrospective analysis of peer review comments.
Some additional R&D subjects recommended by peer review comments have also been studied successfully in recent years.
"This is in marked contrast to the situation we often face going for mainstream funding in the UK," he says, "where one invests massive efforts in a grant application, goes through a lengthy, multi-stage review process, gets magnificent peer review comments, then many months later get told that unfortunately there are insufficient funds for your project".
These steps were revised in line with peer review comments.
EB performed the statistical analysis on the second Measure for Measure survey and advised and commented on the manuscript and peer review comments.
CM performed the Lesbewell surveys in 1995 7, completed the statistical analysis in 2006 and has drafted the manuscript and responded to peer review comments.
I generally agree with David Ropeik (albeit with a bit less drama) that the overall communication is highly suspect and would be amazed if it gets published at a reputable journal (and the "it's too important to wait for peer review" comment is particularly troubling).
Anonymous peer-review comments may spark legal battle.
The agency's reaction to the peer-review comments has been somewhat muted.
(A Springer representative tells Nature News that review went quickly in part because Huang and his colleagues also submitted the peer-review comments provided to them by Nature and Science and had revised the paper with them in mind).
In another example, the Highland Mining Company in 2012 filed open records requests seeking raw data, documents, and peer-review comments on the work of Michael Hendryx, formerly of West Virginia University and now at Indiana University, "who had investigated connections between mountaintop removal mining and adverse health effects such as cancer," the report states.
