review from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'review from' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to mean ‘a review taken from’ or ‘an analysis of something taken from’ and is typically followed by a source. For example, "The article includes a review from the New York Times."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

George Loomis's review from Amsterdam.

The New York Times

No review from England.

The Guardian - Sport

George Loomis's review from Versailles, France.

The New York Times

What a fine review from Graeme Smith.

The Guardian - Sport

Read the full review from Peter Bradshaw.

The Guardian - Film

Another book review from Freya Raven.

The Guardian

Read a review from Mal Peet.

The Guardian

Read Paul Mardles' three-star review from the Observer, here.

The Guardian - Music

Or the annual review from your personal wealth management consultants?

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

"Terrible reviews from lowbrow publications".

The New Yorker

Holland Cotter reviews from Venice.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "review from" to introduce an opinion or judgment from a recognized authority to support your argument.

Common error

Ensure the source of the "review from" is explicitly stated to avoid confusion about who is providing the review.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review from" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, typically indicating the origin or source of a review. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and commonly used. Examples show it linking a review to its author or publication.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

30%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Academia

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "review from" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed construction, as confirmed by Ludwig. Its primary function is to attribute a review or assessment to its source, adding credibility and context. It is commonly used across various domains, including news, science, and general knowledge resources like wikis. While versatile, it's crucial to clearly identify the source being referenced. Alternatives like "assessment from" or "critique from" offer similar but nuanced meanings. By following these guidelines, writers can use "review from" effectively to enhance the clarity and authority of their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessment from

Emphasizes a formal evaluation or judgment, differing from a general review.

critique from

Highlights a more critical or analytical perspective, implying a detailed examination.

analysis from

Focuses on a detailed examination and interpretation of something, often more in-depth than a review.

report from

Indicates an account or statement, possibly including a review component.

evaluation from

Implies a systematic determination of merit, worth, or significance.

perspective from

Highlights a viewpoint or attitude from a specific source regarding something.

feedback from

Focuses on opinions or reactions received from a source about something.

response from

Indicates a reaction or reply received from a source.

interpretation from

Focuses on the way someone explains or understands something.

commentary from

Suggests a set of explanatory or critical notes on a text.

FAQs

How can I use "review from" in a sentence?

Use "review from" to indicate that you are citing or referencing an evaluation or analysis originating from a particular source. For example, "The conclusion is based on a "review from" the New England Journal of Medicine".

What are some alternatives to using "review from"?

You can use alternatives like "assessment by", "critique by", or "analysis by" depending on the context and the nature of the evaluation you are referencing. Each alternative offers a slightly different nuance.

Is it correct to say "a review of" instead of "review from"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "A review of" generally refers to the subject being reviewed, while ""review from"" refers to the source providing the review. For example, "A review of the book" versus ""review from" The New York Times".

What's the difference between "feedback on" and ""review from""?

"Feedback on" typically refers to specific responses or reactions to a particular thing or event, while ""review from"" indicates a more structured and often published assessment by a recognized source.