responsibilities to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "responsibilities to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing obligations or duties that one has towards someone or something. Example: "As a manager, I have several responsibilities to my team, including providing support and guidance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The person responsible for QA should have the following responsibilities: To manage the general QA system.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Delegate responsibilities to others.

The New York Times

You've always fulfilled your responsibilities to America.

The Guardian

"No responsibilities, to not worry about paying rent.

The New York Times

Bennett said he expected his responsibilities to change.

The New York Times - Sports

And courts should consider their responsibilities to protect shareholders.

The New York Times

Today directors are taking their responsibilities to shareholders more seriously".

The Economist

With your approval, I recommend expanding my responsibilities to include...'...

Independent

The Detroit automakers have large financial responsibilities to their retirees.

The New York Times

We have responsibilities to people who came before us.

Independent

What were my ethical responsibilities to this couple?

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "responsibilities to", ensure the context clearly defines who or what those responsibilities are directed towards. Clarity prevents ambiguity and ensures effective communication.

Common error

Avoid framing "responsibilities to" as optional actions. Responsibilities are duties or obligations, not choices. For example, instead of saying "They considered their responsibilities to help", state "They understood their responsibilities to help."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "responsibilities to" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating duties, obligations, or accountabilities directed towards specific entities, individuals, or concepts. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "responsibilities to" is a common and grammatically correct way to express obligations or duties towards individuals, groups, or entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various contexts, especially in news, scientific, and formal business settings. While interchangeable with synonyms like "duties to" or "obligations to", it's crucial to maintain clarity regarding the specific recipients of these responsibilities. Avoiding confusion between "responsibilities to" and related terms like "responsibility for" ensures precise and effective communication. Therefore, writers should focus on contextual accuracy and clarity when employing this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

duties towards

Changes preposition, slightly altering the focus from direct recipients to a more general sense of obligation.

obligations towards

Replaces "responsibilities" with a synonym denoting a binding requirement, shifting the emphasis slightly to legal or moral imperatives.

accountabilities towards

Substitutes "responsibilities" with a term highlighting the need to justify actions or decisions to others.

under a duty to

A more formal way of stating one's obligations, often used in legal or official contexts.

bound to

Expresses a sense of being legally or morally compelled to fulfill certain responsibilities.

commitments to

Highlights the aspect of dedication and promise in fulfilling responsibilities, framing them as choices rather than mandates.

liabilities to

Replaces the main word with a term that specifies legal or financial obligations, narrowing the scope of responsibility.

answerable to

Shifts the focus to being held accountable by someone or something, rather than simply having responsibilities.

burdens to

Emphasizes the onerous nature of responsibilities, suggesting a heavier or more demanding set of duties.

subject to

Implies being under the control or authority of something, necessitating the fulfillment of certain responsibilities.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "responsibilities to" in a formal context?

In formal settings, consider using alternatives such as "obligations towards", "duties towards", or "accountabilities towards" to maintain a professional tone.

What's the difference between "responsibilities to" and "responsibility for"?

"Responsibilities to" indicates obligations or duties directed toward someone or something, while "responsibility for" signifies accountability or control over something. For example, "responsibilities to shareholders" versus "responsibility for project management".

Is it correct to use "responsibilities to" when referring to inanimate objects?

Yes, it is correct if you are referring to obligations towards maintaining or respecting those objects. For example, "responsibilities to the environment" or "responsibilities to preserve historical artifacts".

What are some common synonyms for "responsibilities" that I can use with the preposition "to"?

Common synonyms include "obligations to", "duties to", "commitments to", and "liabilities to", each subtly altering the nuance of the sentence.