liabilities to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "liabilities to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing financial obligations or responsibilities owed to another party. Example: "The company has significant liabilities to its creditors that must be addressed in the upcoming fiscal year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But he still had other liabilities to overcome.

The New Yorker

In doing so, we're becoming assets, not liabilities, to society.

The Guardian

It is possible for British companies to offload their pension liabilities to an insurance company.

The Economist

First, it let the banks default on liabilities to overseas creditors, including deposits in offshore accounts.

The New York Times

This is when they decided to sell their liabilities to their clients.

The New York Times

The nation's governors face a daunting $555 billion in unfunded liabilities to finance retiree health coverage.

The New York Times

Comerica is paying 2.4 times book value, or assets minus liabilities, to buy Imperial.

The New York Times

Such collateral should, in principle, diminish Enron's actual liabilities to the derivatives market, he said.

The New York Times

Such as the Treasury's assurances that there were no contingent liabilities to the Nissan deal.

The Guardian - Business

The Bradfords reported $99,000 in tax liabilities to several states and the federal government.

The Guardian

The Federal Reserve has guaranteed Bear's liabilities to the tune of $30 billion.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial obligations, be specific about the nature of the "liabilities to". Clarify whether you are referring to financial debts, legal obligations, or other types of responsibilities.

Common error

Avoid using "liabilities to" in contexts where a simpler term like "responsibilities" or "obligations" would suffice. Using a more specific term can enhance clarity and prevent misunderstandings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "liabilities to" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating the recipient or beneficiary of a financial or legal obligation. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase is correct and usable in written English, denoting a relationship of debt or responsibility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "liabilities to" is a correct and widely used prepositional phrase primarily found in formal contexts such as news, business, and legal writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it clearly indicates a relationship of debt or obligation owed from one party to another. While alternatives like "obligations toward" or "debts owed to" exist, "liabilities to" is particularly suited for financial and legal discussions. Remember to be specific about the type of liability and consider whether a simpler term might be more appropriate for clarity. With a high expert rating and frequent usage in authoritative sources, "liabilities to" remains a valuable phrase for precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obligations toward

Focuses on a moral or legal duty, shifting from a purely financial perspective to a broader sense of commitment.

debts owed to

Specifically highlights the financial aspect of owing money or resources.

responsibilities for

Emphasizes the duties and accountabilities related to a particular task or role.

accountabilities to

Highlights the obligation to answer for something; it is more about being answerable.

indebtedness to

Stresses a state of being in debt, either financially or morally.

dues payable to

Specifically indicates amounts that must be paid, often in a scheduled manner.

arrears owed to

Denotes accumulated debts that are overdue.

commitments towards

Emphasizes promises or agreements made, carrying a sense of dedication.

exposures regarding

Focuses on potential risks or vulnerabilities related to specific situations or entities.

deficiencies relative to

Highlights shortcomings or areas where something falls short compared to expectations or standards.

FAQs

How can I use "liabilities to" in a sentence?

You can use "liabilities to" when referring to debts, obligations, or responsibilities that an entity owes to another party. For example, "The company has significant liabilities to its creditors."

What are some alternatives to "liabilities to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "obligations toward", "debts owed to", or "responsibilities for".

When is it appropriate to use "liabilities to" instead of "obligations to"?

"Liabilities to" is more specific to financial or legal debts and responsibilities, while "obligations to" can encompass moral or ethical duties. Use "liabilities to" when referring to quantifiable debts or legal responsibilities.

Is there a difference between "liabilities to" and "responsibilities for"?

Yes, while both indicate a form of duty, "liabilities to" typically refers to financial or legal obligations. "Responsibilities for" is broader and includes duties, tasks, or areas where someone is accountable. For instance, one has "liabilities to" a bank, but has "responsibilities for" managing a project.