Exact(1)
Irrespective of the inclusion of a trend in the specification, the three panel unit root tests (which take on a value of −5.963, 101.026 and 1528.72 for the no-trend specification and −7.478, 114.825 and 1723.867 for the trend specification, respectively) reject the joint unit root null hypothesis, in favor of the stationarity of the idiosyncratic component.
Similar(7)
An approximately unbiased test constraining the monophyly of Nephilengys, Nephila, and Nephilinae (Nephila, Nephilengys, Herennia), respectively, rejected Nephilengys monophyly, but not that of Nephila and Nephilinae.
In these categories, 63 and 109 genes, respectively, rejected the monophyly of Amoebozoa and were retained.
Similarly, high percentages of bar workers agreed that the ban would encourage smokers to quit (69%) and that there was a need for the ban to protect workers' health (80%) with only small proportions (10%and8%8% respectively) rejecting these views (questions G, H).
Use of sample sizes of 132 (lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily), 132 (celecoxib 200 mg twice daily) and 66 (placebo group) resulted in powers of 94%, 98%and80%0%, respectively, to reject the three hypotheses in turn.
Alignments with a misaligned GT or AG di-nucleotide at the donor or acceptor sites, respectively, were rejected.
Reads with more than 2 or 5 bases having quality scores ≤3 in the first 12 or 25 bases, respectively, were rejected [ 58].
If Ignisphaera aggregans was not considered, the monophyly of the Desulfurococcaceae (excluding Ignisphaera aggregans and Pyrodictiacean species) would be supported by only small probabilities by the AU test and KH test (P = 0.062, and 0.071, respectively) and rejected by the NP test (P < 0.001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com