requirements on

USAGE SUMMARY

"requirements on" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the obligations, standards, or conditions that must be met. For example, You must meet all of the requirements on the job application to be considered for the position.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Strong requirements on plasma vertical stability require close-in conductors.

Fusion Engineering and Design

It will have tough requirements on inspections.

The New York Times

Impose new capital requirements on banks.

The New York Times

It also imposes no requirements on rotating auditors.

The New York Times

So, you are in favor higher capital requirements on banks.

The New Yorker

"I have no expectations or requirements on time," she said.

The New York Times - Books

There are few requirements on compensation, or on audit committees.

The Economist

CALEA imposes requirements on service providers like phone companies.

Forbes

States have placed varying requirements on drilling companies.

The New York Times

"Everton have additional requirements on the method of payment.

Independent

Among the outcomes of the meeting: China agreed to remove local-content requirements on wind turbines.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements on", clearly specify what is being required and who or what is subject to those requirements. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "requirements on" without specifying the entity or area to which the requirements apply. For example, instead of saying 'There are requirements on this', specify 'There are requirements on the budget allocation process'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements on" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, indicating the presence of specific stipulations or conditions that must be met. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is correct and frequently used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "requirements on" is a correct and commonly used prepositional phrase to indicate the presence of specific stipulations or conditions that must be met. Ludwig AI confirms its accuracy and widespread usage across various contexts. It's essential to specify the entity or area to which the requirements apply to maintain clarity. Alternatives like "demands placed on" or "conditions imposed on" can be used depending on the desired nuance. It is a versatile phrase found frequently in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

demands placed on

This alternative emphasizes the aspect of imposing a need or expectation.

conditions imposed on

Focuses on specific stipulations that must be met.

stipulations for

Highlights specific conditions or terms.

obligations regarding

Emphasizes legal or moral duties in relation to something.

criteria for

Focuses on the standards by which something is judged or assessed.

prerequisites for

Specifies conditions that must be satisfied beforehand.

constraints affecting

Highlights limitations or restrictions.

specifications for

Details precise standards or guidelines.

mandates concerning

Emphasizes authoritative commands or orders.

provisions governing

Highlights legal or regulatory rules.

FAQs

How do I use "requirements on" in a sentence?

You can use "requirements on" to indicate what obligations or standards apply to a particular entity or process. For example, "The new regulations impose stricter "requirements on" emissions standards".

What are some alternatives to "requirements on"?

Some alternatives include "demands placed on", "conditions imposed on", or "obligations regarding", depending on the specific context.

How does "requirements on" differ from "requirements for"?

"Requirements on" typically refers to obligations placed upon something, whereas "requirements for" refers to needs or prerequisites in order to achieve something. For instance, "requirements on banks" versus "requirements for a loan".

Is it better to use "requirements for" or "requirements on"?

It depends on the context. Use "requirements on" when specifying what obligations or standards apply to something (e.g., ""requirements on" data security"). Use "requirements for" when specifying what is needed to achieve something (e.g., "requirements for project completion").