reputation for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reputation for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an individual or institution's record of past performance. For example, "The university has a strong reputation for excellence in the sciences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We had a reputation for quality products.

The New York Times

He has a reputation for shrewdness.

The Economist

She had a reputation for independence.

The New York Times

Its reputation for offering good value slipped.

The Economist

Badgers have a reputation for being grumpy.

The Economist

ARGENTINA'S reputation for transparency is poor.

The Economist

He has a reputation for personal probity.

The Economist

Patrick had a reputation for ruthless violence.

Independent

My reputation, for instance".

The New York Times

A reputation for reliability brings other benefits.

The Economist

But its reputation for tranquillity was dwindling.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "reputation for" when highlighting a well-established and widely recognized characteristic of an individual, company, or place. For example, "The company has a strong "reputation for" innovation."

Common error

Avoid using "reputation for" when describing qualities that are temporary or not yet firmly established. A "reputation for" implies a consistent, long-term perception.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reputation for" functions as a descriptor, attributing a specific quality or characteristic that is widely associated with a person, place, or thing. This is affirmed by Ludwig, which shows various examples of its usage in describing established attributes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reputation for" is a versatile and frequently used descriptor, employed to convey a widely recognized attribute or characteristic of a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and appears across various contexts, predominantly in News & Media. While alternatives like "known for" or "famous for" exist, "reputation for" specifically emphasizes an established perception. Remember to use it for qualities that are consistent and long-term, avoiding its application to temporary or unconfirmed traits.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

known for

Focuses on public recognition of a specific attribute.

famous for

Emphasizes widespread recognition and fame.

regarded as

Highlights how someone or something is perceived.

considered to be

Similar to 'regarded as' but with a slightly more formal tone.

has a name for

Indicates an established and well-known characteristic.

recognized for

Highlights specific achievements or qualities that are acknowledged.

characterized by

Focuses on the defining characteristics of something.

held in esteem for

Implies a high level of respect and admiration.

credited with

Acknowledges someone's contribution or positive quality.

associated with

Highlights a common connection or link to a specific trait or activity.

FAQs

How can I use "reputation for" in a sentence?

You can use "reputation for" to describe the widely held belief or opinion about someone or something. For example, "The restaurant has a "reputation for" excellent service."

What are some alternatives to "reputation for"?

Some alternatives include "known for", "famous for", or "regarded as", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "reputation for" or "reputation of"?

"Reputation for" is generally used to describe the characteristic or quality that someone or something is known for. "Reputation of" is less common but can refer to the general state or condition of someone's reputation.

Can "reputation for" be used in a negative context?

Yes, "reputation for" can be used in both positive and negative contexts. For example, "The company has a "reputation for" poor customer service."