Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
famous for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"famous for" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use it when describing something or someone that is well known for a particular skill or attribute. For example, "Babe Ruth was famous for his impressive home run records."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He's famous for this.
News & Media
Famous for fashion?
News & Media
"Not famous for me".
News & Media
That's what it's famous for.
News & Media
"Cambridge is famous for that".
News & Media
Japan is famous for suicide.
News & Media
She's famous for being famous.
News & Media
Famous for: Winning The X Factor.
News & Media
It is famous for three things.
News & Media
"It's famous for being on Vanderbilt Avenue".
News & Media
He was famous for lacking vision.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "famous for", ensure the reason for fame is clearly and directly stated to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "famous for" without specifying why the subject is famous. For example, instead of saying "The city is famous", specify "The city is famous for its architecture".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "famous for" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate the reason for its widespread recognition or renown. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard and usable phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
42%
Encyclopedias
11%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Science
6%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "famous for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe the reason for someone or something's fame. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in News & Media and Encyclopedic sources, it maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse contexts. Alternatives like ""known for"" or ""renowned for"" offer nuanced variations, while remembering to specify the reason for fame enhances clarity. Be mindful of using "infamous" for negative attributions. In essence, "famous for" is a versatile and reliable phrase for attributing recognition, but its effectiveness lies in precise and contextually appropriate application.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
known for
A more straightforward substitute, focusing on general knowledge about the subject.
well-known for
A simpler way to express wide recognition.
renowned for
Implies a higher degree of fame and respect.
popular for
Indicates widespread appeal and liking.
notable for
Highlights a specific characteristic that stands out.
celebrated for
Emphasizes positive recognition and admiration.
distinguished for
Suggests a unique and respected quality.
regarded for
Focuses on the perception and opinion of others.
remembered for
Highlights lasting impact or legacy.
notorious for
Used when someone is famous for negative reasons.
FAQs
How can I use "famous for" in a sentence?
Use "famous for" to describe the reason someone or something is well known, like "The chef is "famous for" his innovative desserts".
What is a good substitute for "famous for"?
Alternatives include "known for", "renowned for", or "notable for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "famous for" or "well-known for"?
"Famous for" and "well-known for" are often interchangeable, but "famous" implies a greater degree of recognition. For example, a landmark might be "famous for" its historical significance.
What is the difference between "famous for" and "infamous for"?
"Famous for" describes positive or neutral recognition, while "infamous for" describes negative recognition. You would say a hero is "famous for" their bravery, but a villain is "infamous for" their cruelty.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested