known for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "known for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that someone or something has become famous or notorious for something. For example: John is known for his charitable donations to underprivileged communities.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Best known for?

Independent

He's known for that.

The New Yorker

He's known for improvising.

Independent

Be known for something.

The New York Times

CANADIANS are known for humility.

The Economist

Boston is known for talking.

The New York Times - Sports

I became known for masks.

The New York Times

Both are known for laboring.

The New York Times - Sports

(He's known for his whites).

The New York Times

"It's known for being tough.

The New York Times - Sports

Librarians aren't known for subversiveness.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "known for", ensure that the reason or attribute is widely accepted and supported by evidence to maintain credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "known for" to describe attributes that are subjective or not widely recognized. For example, instead of saying "He is known for being funny" without context, clarify by saying "He is known among his friends for being funny."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "known for" functions as a linking phrase that connects a subject with its defining characteristic or reputation. It helps to attribute a specific quality, achievement, or notoriety to the subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a common and grammatically correct phrase used across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Wiki

25%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "known for" serves as a cornerstone in descriptive language, allowing writers to concisely convey the defining characteristics or reputation of a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and appropriate across various contexts. The phrase is commonly used in "News & Media", "Wiki", and "Encyclopedias", highlighting its versatility in both formal and informal writing. When employing "known for", ensure the stated attribute is widely recognized and supported by evidence to enhance credibility and accuracy. By avoiding overgeneralizations and considering context, writers can effectively use "known for" to create clear and impactful descriptions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

famous for

Focuses on widespread fame or recognition, often implying a positive connotation.

renowned for

Emphasizes high esteem and respect, suggesting exceptional quality or achievement.

noted for

Highlights specific qualities or attributes that are particularly noticeable or remarkable.

recognized for

Indicates formal acknowledgment or appreciation of specific contributions or characteristics.

celebrated for

Suggests widespread public praise and admiration for particular accomplishments or qualities.

distinguished for

Implies a unique and exceptional quality that sets someone or something apart from others.

infamous for

Highlights notoriety or negative reputation due to scandalous or harmful actions.

remembered for

Focuses on how someone or something is recalled or commemorated over time.

regarded for

Indicates a specific viewpoint or perspective on someone or something's attributes.

established for

Highlights the origins and reason for establishing or founding something.

FAQs

How do I use "known for" in a sentence?

Use "known for" to describe the quality or characteristic that someone or something is famous or recognized for. For example, "Italy is "famous for" its delicious food" or "She is "recognized for" her dedication to environmental causes".

What are some alternatives to "known for"?

Some alternatives include "famous for", "renowned for", "noted for", "recognized for", or "celebrated for", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "well known for"?

Yes, "well known for" is a valid and commonly used variation of "known for", emphasizing the extent to which someone or something is recognized for a particular attribute.

What's the difference between "known for" and "notorious for"?

"Known for" generally refers to a neutral or positive attribute, while "notorious for" implies a negative or infamous reputation. For example, a scientist might be "known for" their groundbreaking research, while a criminal might be "notorious for" their crimes.