reporting were extracted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reporting were extracted for" is not correct in English.
It seems to be a fragment that lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The data reporting were extracted for analysis needs to be revised for clarity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Data on sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and outcome reporting were extracted for each retention trial to assess risk of bias.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Data on background characteristics (participants, study purpose, sample size, design, scales reported) were extracted for each study.

BMC Geriatrics

Where reported, ORs were extracted for low versus high socioeconomic status.

BMJ Open

If studies did not report this, data were extracted for men and women combined.

BMC Public Health

In 3 studies also subjects with at least one local [ 16– 18] or systemic [ 15– 17] reaction were reported and these values were extracted for the meta-analysis, in others the most frequent local [ 15] or systemic [ 18] reaction was extracted.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Data were extracted for all reported time points.

BMJ Open

Data on mean adherence outcomes were extracted for each reported adherence variable, with a 95%% confidence interval (CI) or standard deviation (SD) for all the study groups.

Drugs

15 Data on SF-36 outcomes were extracted for the reported analyses that corresponded as closely as possible to the same time points as for primary outcome data.

British Medical Journal

In studies reporting more than one outcome measure, data were extracted for the primary outcome.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Using the Animal Bite Keyword Report, statewide ED visit data were extracted for 2008 2010.

Emerging Health Threats Journal

Using the Animal Bite ICD-9-CM Code Report, statewide ED visit data were extracted for 2008 2010.

Emerging Health Threats Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to data extraction, ensure that the sentence clearly indicates the source of the data and follows correct grammatical structure. Replace the phrase with a more accurate and grammatically sound alternative, such as "reported data were extracted".

Common error

Avoid using "reporting were extracted for" due to its grammatically incorrect structure. The word "reporting" cannot be pluralized and used as the subject with the plural verb "were". Instead, clarify what data is being extracted and correct the verb agreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reporting were extracted for" attempts to describe the action of extracting data from reports. However, it presents grammatical inconsistencies. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically incorrect and suggests alternative formulations for clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reporting were extracted for" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this, suggesting it should be avoided in favor of grammatically sound alternatives such as "reported data were extracted" or "data from reports were extracted". Its intended purpose is to describe data extraction from reports, but its flawed structure undermines its effectiveness, making it unsuitable for formal or scientific writing. Therefore, it's best to opt for clearer, more precise phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reported data were extracted

Reorders the original phrase to create a more grammatically correct sentence structure.

data from reports were extracted

Emphasizes the source of the data as "reports" and corrects the sentence structure.

information reported was extracted

Focuses on the "information" that was extracted, making the sentence clearer.

extracted data from the reporting

Highlights the action of extraction and refers to "reporting" as a process or activity.

reported figures were extracted

Specifies that "figures" or numerical data were extracted from the reports.

data were extracted as reported

Uses "as reported" to indicate a previously specified manner or condition of extraction.

outcomes reported were extracted

Focuses on the extraction of specific "outcomes" mentioned in the reports.

findings from the reports were extracted

Highlights that "findings" are being extracted from the source reports.

indicators reported were extracted

Specifies "indicators" as the data being extracted, clarifying the type of information.

relevant data were extracted from the reporting

Highlights the relevancy of data which was extracted from the source.

FAQs

What is a grammatically correct way to express that information was extracted from reports?

Instead of saying "reporting were extracted for", you can say "reported data were extracted" or "data from reports were extracted".

What does "reporting were extracted for" mean?

The phrase attempts to convey that data or information from reports were taken for a specific purpose. However, the grammatical structure is incorrect. A clearer phrasing might be "information reported was extracted".

How can I rephrase "reporting were extracted for" to be more precise?

To be more precise, specify what kind of data was extracted. For example, you could say "reported figures were extracted" or "outcomes reported were extracted".

Is "reporting were extracted for" considered formal or informal language?

Due to its grammatical errors, "reporting were extracted for" is not suitable for formal writing. Use more grammatically sound alternatives like "data were extracted as reported" in professional or academic contexts.