Information from incident reports was extracted onto standard coding sheets.
Project data reflected in this article were de-identified by the authors of the original reports from which information was extracted.
From each report, the following information was extracted: patient demographics, co-morbidities, suspected reactions, suspected drug as well as concomitant treatments, dosage, duration of andrographis treatment, date of adverse event onset, clinical outcome, causality assessment, and the source of reports.
In case of a lack of relevant information in the reports published by our group, information was extracted from the original databases.
The following information was extracted from each report: author, year of publication, country of origin, ethnicity, demographics, cancer type, and detail genotyping information and source of controls (population-based and hospital-based).
Information was extracted according to an Utstein template for data reporting from in-the-field advanced airway management.
Where supervising clinicians could not be contacted, information was extracted from the published reports [ 8, 9, 11, 14].
Whenever these studies also reported on the proportion of ADRs in the article, this information was extracted from the study.
DEG information was extracted by counting the read information.
Information was extracted directly from the clinical trial reports or summaries.
After colonoscopy was performed, reports on colonoscopic and histological findings were collected and information was extracted in a standardised manner.
