repercussions with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "repercussions with" is not commonly used in written English and may not convey the intended meaning clearly.
It can be used when discussing the consequences or effects of an action, but it is more appropriate to use "repercussions of" or "repercussions for." Example: "The decision to cut funding had serious repercussions with the community, leading to widespread protests."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

(She asked that her name not be printed to avoid repercussions with her employer).

The New York Times - Magazine

Conservatives seem deeply worried about the repercussions, with some saying the plan could lead to a crime wave, or worse.

The New York Times

The resultant reshuffle is likely to have wide-ranging repercussions with Sir Richard Stagg, the High Commissioner in Delhi, getting the plumb America job.

Independent

White House officials supported the Justice proposal, but the State Department lodged objections, fearing diplomatic repercussions with allies in the war on terror, administration officials said.

The New York Times

Nonetheless, denying his application may have some repercussions with GOI officials, especially those from India's Intelligence Bureau who have been close to his case.

The Guardian

Though America's Cup officials have expressed disappointment in the decision, there will apparently be no disciplinary repercussions with Tom Ehman, vice commodore of the Golden Gate Yacht Club, who called the review committee directive a recommendation.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

It brought the biggest repercussion, with Stale Solbakken getting fired by the Wolves just six months after he was hired.

The New York Times - Sports

Hartlepool fans demanded a red card; Knight chose to caution Liddle - a decision that was to have a major repercussion with his important goal.

The Guardian - Sport

"That story was not in the best interest of English football and has had enormous adverse repercussions already with regard to the 2018 World Cup bid.

Independent

Ince has presumably weighed up all of the repercussions, starting with the boos that followed him around the pitch at Molineux on Friday, but gone with it anyway.

The Guardian - Sport

The demonstrations themselves were not much different, but one has to wonder whether or not the ability to share the demonstrations [and their repercussions] with people around the world affected how the Iranian people communicated their feelings.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use more precise alternatives like "repercussions of" or "repercussions for" to clearly indicate the relationship between an action and its effects. This improves clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "repercussions". The correct preposition to use is typically "of" or "for", depending on the context. For example, "repercussions of the decision" or "repercussions for the company."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "repercussions with" aims to denote consequences or effects resulting from a particular action or situation. Although comprehensible, it deviates from standard grammatical conventions, as highlighted by Ludwig AI's grammatical assessment.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6.66%

Reference

6.66%

Encyclopedias

6.66%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "repercussions with" appears in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests using more standard alternatives like "repercussions of" or "repercussions for" to ensure clarity and precision in writing. Using these alternatives enhances the readability and credibility of your text, aligning with best practices in grammar and style. Consider the context to choose the most suitable replacement, focusing on clearly establishing the relationship between actions and their consequences. It is more accurate to replace "repercussions with" with "consequences of", "effects of", or "implications of".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consequences of

Focuses on the direct results following an event.

effects of

Highlights the impact or outcome resulting from something.

implications of

Emphasizes the broader, often indirect, results or consequences.

ramifications of

Similar to implications, suggesting complex and far-reaching consequences.

results of

Highlights the outcome directly produced by an action or event.

outcomes of

Similar to results, but may imply a more comprehensive assessment.

aftermath of

Focuses on the period immediately following a significant event and its consequences.

fallout from

Suggests negative consequences or disruptions resulting from an event.

sequelae of

A more formal term for consequences, often used in medical or scientific contexts.

ensuing from

Indicates that something follows directly as a result of a preceding event.

FAQs

How can I use "repercussions of" correctly in a sentence?

Use "repercussions of" to link an action or event to its consequences. For example, "The "repercussions of the war" are still felt today."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "repercussions with"?

Instead of "repercussions with", consider using alternatives like "consequences of", "effects of", or "implications of" to improve clarity.

Is it grammatically correct to say "repercussions with"?

No, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is usually "repercussions of" or "repercussions for."

What's the difference between "repercussions of" and "repercussions for"?

"Repercussions of" refers to the direct consequences stemming from an event, while "repercussions for" indicates who or what will be affected by those consequences.