rejected to

USAGE SUMMARY

The use of the phrase "rejected to" is not grammatically correct in written English. Instead, you should use "rejected" in this context. For example: The professor rejected my request to change the due date.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This thermal energy is then rejected to a heat sink.

Applied Thermal Engineering

The heat is then "rejected" to the sea.

Desalination

In the process, the branching sites are rejected to the fold surface gradually.

Polymer

During this compression, heat per unit mass is rejected to the source at.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The union has five business days after a contract is rejected to file an appeal.

The New York Times

Permanent theater-style seating was rejected "to have flexible space," he said.

The New York Times

There were enough other characters considered and rejected to populate another car.

The New York Times

This decrease in the seawater coolant temperature before it is rejected to the sea therefore prevents thermal pollution.

Journal of Cleaner Production

In summer, the heat rejected to the soil was reduced by 32%, which was helpful for the earth energy conservation.

Energy

This heat is rejected to the environment in almost all practical situations partially by natural air convection.

International Journal of Refrigeration

"But he went from being reviled and rejected to being revered," Jackson said.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and correctness, replace "rejected to" with more standard alternatives like "rejected by" or "refused to".

Common error

Avoid using "rejected to" in formal writing. Although it appears in various sources, it is not considered grammatically correct and can detract from your writing's credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rejected to" functions as a verb phrase with a preposition, typically aiming to convey the action of refusing or dismissing something. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this phrasing is grammatically incorrect in standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

39%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "rejected to" is frequently used across various domains, including science, news media, and academia. However, Ludwig AI points out that it's grammatically incorrect in standard English. The intended meaning revolves around expressing refusal or dismissal. For grammatically sound and clear writing, it's best to use alternatives like ""rejected by"" or ""refused to"", particularly in formal contexts. While commonly encountered, adhering to correct grammar enhances the credibility and clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was rejected by

This alternative provides a passive construction with "by" indicating the agent doing the rejecting, improving grammatical correctness.

declined to

This phrase uses a more formal verb, 'decline', to convey the idea of refusing something, offering a direct and grammatically sound alternative.

refused to

Using "refused to" offers a straightforward way to express a denial or unwillingness, maintaining clarity and grammatical correctness.

turned down

This phrasal verb is a common and clear way to indicate that something was not accepted or approved.

dismissed

This alternative suggests something was disregarded or treated as unworthy of consideration, maintaining grammatical correctness.

vetoed

This word implies a formal rejection, often used in political or organizational contexts, providing a more specific alternative.

was not accepted

This passive construction emphasizes the lack of acceptance, providing a grammatically sound alternative.

turned away

This phrasal verb suggests a rejection that involves denying access or entry, offering a nuanced alternative.

repudiated

Using "repudiated" implies a strong and formal rejection, suitable for contexts where disavowal is emphasized.

rebuffed

This alternative suggests a blunt or abrupt rejection, adding a layer of intensity to the meaning.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct alternative to "rejected to"?

The correct way to phrase this is "rejected by" or "refused to". For example, instead of saying "The proposal was rejected to the committee", say "The proposal "was rejected by" the committee" or "The committee "refused to accept" the proposal".

Is "rejected to" ever considered correct in English?

No, "rejected to" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's best to use alternative phrases like "rejected by" or "refused to".

How can I use "rejected" correctly in a sentence?

Use "rejected" followed by "by" to indicate who or what did the rejecting: "The application was "rejected by" the admissions committee". Alternatively, use "refused to" to show someone's unwillingness: "The committee "refused to approve" the plan".

What's the difference between saying "rejected to" and "rejected by"?

"Rejected to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is ""rejected by"", which indicates who or what did the rejecting. For example, "The manuscript was "rejected by" the publisher" is correct; "The manuscript was "rejected to" the publisher" is not.