Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

rejected by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"rejected by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something has been refused or not accepted by someone. For example: His application was rejected by the college due to lack of qualifications.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

That was rejected by voters.

News & Media

The Economist

That plan was rejected by a judge.

News & Media

The New York Times

He felt rejected by everything he loved.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Both proposals were rejected by F.B.I. supervisors.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was rejected by eight publishers.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But even this was rejected by Argentina.

News & Media

The New York Times

"He is rejected by the people".

News & Media

The New York Times

This constitution was rejected by the voters.

It has been rejected by both sides.

News & Media

The Economist

That claim was rejected by Pakistani officials.

News & Media

The New York Times

This was strongly rejected by Cazenove.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "rejected by", ensure that the context clearly identifies who or what did the rejecting and what was rejected. This avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using alternative prepositions like "rejected from" when "rejected by" is the standard and grammatically correct choice for indicating the agent of rejection.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rejected by" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating that something has been refused or not accepted. According to Ludwig, this construction is grammatically correct and commonly used in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "rejected by" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something has been refused or not accepted. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct and widespread. It appears frequently in various contexts, most notably in news and media. When using this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the rejecting entity and the rejected subject are clearly identified. While alternatives like "refused by" or "turned down by" exist, "rejected by" remains a versatile and reliable choice for conveying non-acceptance in various situations.

FAQs

What does "rejected by" mean?

The phrase "rejected by" indicates that something or someone has been refused or not accepted by a specific entity or group. It implies a decision against acceptance.

How can I use "rejected by" in a sentence?

You can use "rejected by" to show that an application, proposal, or person was not accepted. For example: "The proposal was "turned down by" the committee."

What are some alternatives to "rejected by"?

Some alternatives to "rejected by" include "refused by", "turned down by", or "dismissed by". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use "rejected by" or "rejected from"?

"Rejected by" is generally the correct and preferred phrase to indicate who or what did the rejecting. "Rejected from" is less common and might imply a physical removal rather than a decision of non-acceptance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: