reduced costs

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduced costs" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing financial savings or lower expenses in a business or project context. Example: "The new strategy has led to significantly reduced costs for the company, allowing for increased investment in other areas."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

The result - reduced use, reduced costs and reduced damage from marijuana to peoples lives.

Huffington Post

Reduced costs alone cannot.

The Economist

Even that reduced costs by 5%.

The Guardian - Business

The company said it had reduced costs as bookings declined.

The New York Times

Mr. Grübel has reduced costs by eliminating jobs and shrinking businesses.

The New York Times

The company said it reduced costs and expenses by about $65 million in the quarter.

The New York Times - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

Community based DOT reduced cost by 35%.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

We have to reduce costs.

The New York Times - Health

— has focused on reducing costs.

The New York Times

Would a market-based approach reduce costs?

The New York Times

Neither has established goals to reduce costs.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial performance, quantify "reduced costs" with specific figures or percentages to provide concrete evidence of savings.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the benefits of "reduced costs" without substantiating claims with data. Ensure the reduction is significant and positively impacts overall performance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduced costs" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often used as a subject or object in a sentence. It describes the state of having lower expenses or the result of cost-cutting measures. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

19%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reduced costs" is a common and grammatically sound term used to describe situations where expenses have been lowered. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to convey information about financial savings, most often in business and news contexts. While "reduced costs" is widely used, related phrases like "lower expenses" or "cut expenses" may be suitable alternatives depending on the desired tone and context. When using this phrase, ensure quantifiable data supports claims to avoid overstating the impact. With its frequent use in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, "reduced costs" remains a reliable and understandable phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lower expenses

Changes the verb and noun to convey a similar idea of decreased financial outlay.

cut expenses

Uses a more direct and active verb to suggest actively decreasing expenses.

decreased spending

Focuses on the action of spending, indicating a reduction in the amount spent.

trimming costs

Suggests a more precise and careful reduction in expenses.

cost savings

Focuses on the outcome of reducing costs, emphasizing the savings achieved.

expense reduction

Formal phrasing emphasizing the reduction of expenditures.

lower outlays

Uses an alternative term for expenses, maintaining a similar meaning.

economies

Implies a more broad cost reduction strategy.

lessened expenditure

Formal term to indicate decreasing the amount of money spent

scaled-down costs

Expresses cost reduction through a scaling down operation.

FAQs

How can I use "reduced costs" in a sentence?

You can use "reduced costs" to describe situations where expenses have been lowered. For example: "The company achieved "reduced costs" through process optimization".

What are some alternatives to "reduced costs"?

Alternatives to "reduced costs" include phrases like "lower expenses", "cut expenses", or "decreased spending", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "reduced costs" or "lowered costs"?

Both "reduced costs" and "lowered costs" are acceptable, but "reduced costs" may sound more formal. Choose the phrase that best fits the tone of your writing.

What's the difference between "reducing costs" and "reduced costs"?

"Reducing costs" refers to the action of lowering expenses, while "reduced costs" describes the state where expenses have already been lowered. For example, "Reducing costs is a priority" vs. "The company reported "reduced costs" this quarter".