lower expenses

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'lower expenses' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to reducing the cost of something, for example: "We are confident that implementing recent cost-saving measures will result in lower expenses over the long-term."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And lower expenses lead to higher profits.

The Economist

She tries to lower expenses.

The New York Times

I had to either increase my income or lower expenses.

The Guardian - Money

Profit also received a lift from lower expenses.

The New York Times

If it's indebted, it must lower expenses to pay its debts".

The New Yorker

Both software makers sell applications that help businesses increase sales and lower expenses.

The New York Times

The company credited the news to an increase in demand and productivity and lower expenses.

The New York Times

Those documents contained significantly lower expenses than in the reports submitted to the government.

The New York Times

And frequently, hundreds of workers in the companies' headquarters are laid off to lower expenses.

The New York Times

A bigger portfolio or lower expenses, or both, will increase your risk capacity.

The New York Times

Vine fulminated further – the Milibands claimed lower expenses as "they have stacks of money", she said.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to "lower expenses", consider specifying the area or activity where cost reduction is targeted to provide clarity and context. For example, "lower marketing expenses" or "lower operational expenses".

Common error

Be specific about how expenses are being "lowered". Simply stating a goal to "lower expenses" without a plan or clear actions can lack credibility. Instead, detail the methods being used, such as renegotiating contracts or improving efficiency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lower expenses" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to the act of decreasing or reducing the amount of money spent. Ludwig examples show it used in contexts related to business, finance, and personal finance. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly employed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

22%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lower expenses" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe the act of reducing costs, as validated by Ludwig AI. It's most frequently encountered in news and media contexts, as well as in scientific and formal business settings. When using the phrase, it's best practice to be specific about the areas where expenses are being reduced. Alternatives include "cut costs" and "reduce expenditure". Remember to avoid vague generalizations and provide concrete details about how expenses are being "lowered" to ensure clarity and credibility. The prevalence of the phrase across varied sources confirms its wide acceptance and applicability in discussions regarding financial management and efficiency.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cut costs

This phrase offers a more direct and concise way to express reducing expenses, often implying immediate action.

drive down costs

This implies active and forceful measures to reduce expenses.

decrease spending

This option focuses on the act of spending, suggesting a reduction in the amount of money spent.

reduce expenditure

This alternative uses a more formal vocabulary to convey the idea of decreasing spending.

trim budgets

This alternative specifies that the reduction is happening within a budget context.

curtail expenditure

This suggests limiting or restricting spending, often due to necessity.

economize

This verb implies managing resources carefully to avoid waste and reduce expenses.

control spending

This option suggests managing and regulating spending to prevent it from increasing.

minimize outlays

This phrase uses more technical terminology, suitable for formal financial discussions.

streamline operations

This alternative focuses on improving efficiency to indirectly result in reduced expenses.

FAQs

How can I use "lower expenses" in a sentence?

You can use "lower expenses" to describe actions taken to reduce costs. For example, "The company aims to "cut costs" and "reduce expenditure" in the next fiscal year to improve profitability."

What are some alternatives to saying "lower expenses"?

Alternatives include "reduce expenditure", "cut costs", "decrease spending", or "economize", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is it more effective to focus on "lowering expenses" or "increasing revenue"?

Both strategies are important for financial health. "Lowering expenses" aims to improve efficiency and profitability by reducing costs, while increasing revenue focuses on generating more income. The optimal approach often involves a combination of both.

What is the difference between "lower expenses" and "reduce costs"?

While very similar, "lower expenses" is a more general term, while "reduce costs" can imply a more targeted effort to decrease specific expenditures related to production or operations.