recognised to have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognised to have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when acknowledging or affirming someone's status or achievement in a particular context. Example: "She is recognised to have made significant contributions to the field of science."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Beatification looks even better: 50% of those formally recognised to have entered heaven are women.

The Guardian

He shook up a complacent organisation now widely recognised to have needed it.

The Guardian

Moore's handling of what could have been drastic upsets was widely recognised to have been skilful, discreet and successful.

The Guardian

Despite his ground-breaking work that is now recognised to have shortened the second world war, he was hounded from the secret service over his sexuality.

The Guardian

For the preceding two years Blatter let it be known that he supported Johansson, who was recognised to have integrity and to have done a fine, professional job.

The Guardian - Sport

United's greatest asset since the Glazer takeover is recognised to have been Ferguson, who has won 27 major trophies since joining the club in 1986.

The Guardian - Sport

And Dr Gallo was exonerated of any wrongdoing by an official investigation and is universally recognised to have done important work on AIDS.

The Economist

State grammar schools are recognised to have high levels of achievement in national tests such as GCSEs, and have an enviable record in placing students in prestigious universities.

The Guardian

In McGinley, Europe had a captain who is widely recognised to have worked harder in the role than any of his predecessors.

The Guardian - Sport

Then he confirmed what had so often been speculated: that this plan was part of his ultimate aspiration to claim a Nobel prize, to be recognised to have made a major contribution to world peace.

The Guardian - Sport

"The black market in ticket resales is now widely recognised to have reached an industrial scale, with touts operating anonymously and with impunity on under-regulated secondary ticketing sites," claim those behind the initiative.

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "recognised to have", ensure the subject is genuinely acknowledged by a significant group or body, not just personally believed. This enhances credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "recognised to have" in casual conversation or informal writing; simpler phrases like "known to have" or "seen to have" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognised to have" functions as part of a verb phrase, typically used to express acknowledgement or acceptance of a particular quality, skill, or accomplishment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a grammatically correct and usable phrase. The examples show it often precedes a verb, describing what the subject is recognized for doing or being.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "recognised to have" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for conveying that someone or something is widely acknowledged for a particular attribute or accomplishment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Its primary contexts are in news, scientific, and formal writing. While versatile, it's best suited for neutral to formal registers and should be used judiciously in casual settings. Alternatives such as "known to have" or "considered to have" can offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Remember to use this phrase when there is broad acceptance of the quality you are attributing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

known to have

Replaces "recognised" with "known", indicating a state of being widely understood or accepted.

understood to have

Substitutes "recognised" with "understood", emphasizing comprehension or awareness.

considered to have

Replaces "recognised" with "considered", indicating a degree of thoughtfulness and evaluation.

identified as having

Uses "identified" instead of "recognized", which suggests that something has been specifically pointed out or discovered.

acknowledged to possess

This alternative replaces "recognised" with "acknowledged" and "have" with "possess", emphasizing acceptance of a quality.

regarded as having

Changes the structure to use "regarded as having", which provides a slightly more formal tone.

accepted as having

This alternative uses "accepted" which indicates a broad agreement about a quality or attribute.

deemed to have

Uses "deemed" instead of "recognised", suggesting a formal judgment or assessment.

perceived to have

Replaces "recognised" with "perceived", highlighting subjective interpretation or impression.

believed to have

Uses "believed" instead of "recognised", focusing on conviction or trust rather than formal acknowledgment.

FAQs

How can I use "recognised to have" in a sentence?

The phrase "recognised to have" is used to indicate that someone or something is acknowledged for possessing a particular quality or achievement. For example, "She is "recognised to have" made significant contributions to the field."

What are some alternatives to "recognised to have"?

Alternatives include "known to have", "considered to have", or "acknowledged to have". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "recognised to have" or "recognised as having"?

Both "recognised to have" and "recognised as having" are grammatically correct. "Recognised to have" is generally more concise, while "recognised as having" may sound slightly more formal. Use whichever fits better in your sentence's rhythm and tone.

What's the difference between "recognised to have" and "believed to have"?

"Recognised to have" implies a widespread acknowledgement, often based on evidence or achievements. "Believed to have", on the other hand, suggests a conviction that may not be universally accepted or supported by concrete proof.