Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

considered to have

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "considered to have" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that a particular thing is thought to possess a certain attribute or quality. For example: The canyon is considered to have divine energy, and is a popular destination for spiritual seekers.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This investment has generally considered to have served its purpose.

She is considered to have a shot at winning.

News & Media

The New York Times

The project is now considered to have been entirely successful.

News & Media

The Guardian

Lemieux is considered to have the best hands in hockey.

Pepperidge Farm shortbread cookies are considered to have high amplitude.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The charges are widely considered to have been trumped up.

News & Media

The New York Times

Weaknesses: Brown is not considered to have strong policy chops.

News & Media

The Guardian

In truth, both could be considered to have unfinished business.

Rav Moshe was considered to have special healing powers.

News & Media

The New York Times

OM was considered to have an ischemic cause.

Those with IAP ≥ 20 mmHg were considered to have ACS.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "considered to have" to express a widely held belief or perception about a subject. Ensure the context supports the idea of general consensus rather than individual opinion.

Common error

Avoid relying too heavily on passive constructions with "considered to have", which can make your writing sound vague. Sometimes, a more active voice provides clarity and directness.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "considered to have" functions as a verbal phrase used to attribute a characteristic, quality, or status to a subject based on general opinion or assessment. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

32%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "considered to have" is a versatile phrase used to indicate a generally held belief or opinion, often implying that something is perceived to possess a certain quality. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable across diverse contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and formal writing. The phrase is used for expressing a widely held belief or judgment with the usage leaning towards neutral to formal settings. When using this phrase, ensure that the context supports a general consensus rather than a purely individual perspective. Remember also to be wary of overuse of passive voice, aiming for a more direct style when appropriate.

FAQs

How can I use "considered to have" in a sentence?

Use "considered to have" to indicate a general belief or widely accepted opinion about something. For example, "The ancient artifact is "considered to have" magical properties".

What are some alternatives to "considered to have"?

Alternatives include phrases like "believed to be", "regarded as", or "deemed to be", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify who does the considering when using "considered to have"?

While not always necessary, specifying who holds the belief can add clarity and authority, especially in academic or professional contexts. If the belief is widely held, it can remain implicit.

What's the difference between "considered to have" and "known to have"?

"Considered to have" implies a belief or opinion, while "known to have" suggests established fact or evidence. Use "known to have" when there is verifiable proof.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: