Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered to have
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered to have" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that a particular thing is thought to possess a certain attribute or quality. For example: The canyon is considered to have divine energy, and is a popular destination for spiritual seekers.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
deemed to have
envisioned to have
deemed to be
demonstrated to have
thought to hold
regarded to have
recommended to have
presumed to have
regarded as holding
assumed to embody
judged to have
assessed as having
perceived to contain
introduced to have
excluded to have
designated to have
believed to exhibit
concentrated to have
determined to have
understood to have
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This investment has generally considered to have served its purpose.
News & Media
She is considered to have a shot at winning.
News & Media
The project is now considered to have been entirely successful.
News & Media
Lemieux is considered to have the best hands in hockey.
News & Media
Pepperidge Farm shortbread cookies are considered to have high amplitude.
News & Media
The charges are widely considered to have been trumped up.
News & Media
Weaknesses: Brown is not considered to have strong policy chops.
News & Media
In truth, both could be considered to have unfinished business.
News & Media
Rav Moshe was considered to have special healing powers.
News & Media
OM was considered to have an ischemic cause.
Those with IAP ≥ 20 mmHg were considered to have ACS.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "considered to have" to express a widely held belief or perception about a subject. Ensure the context supports the idea of general consensus rather than individual opinion.
Common error
Avoid relying too heavily on passive constructions with "considered to have", which can make your writing sound vague. Sometimes, a more active voice provides clarity and directness.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered to have" functions as a verbal phrase used to attribute a characteristic, quality, or status to a subject based on general opinion or assessment. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase in written English.
Frequent in
Science
42%
News & Media
32%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "considered to have" is a versatile phrase used to indicate a generally held belief or opinion, often implying that something is perceived to possess a certain quality. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable across diverse contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and formal writing. The phrase is used for expressing a widely held belief or judgment with the usage leaning towards neutral to formal settings. When using this phrase, ensure that the context supports a general consensus rather than a purely individual perspective. Remember also to be wary of overuse of passive voice, aiming for a more direct style when appropriate.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
deemed to possess
Emphasizes a formal judgment or assessment leading to the belief that something possesses a certain quality.
regarded as holding
Implies a certain level of respect or esteem in the assessment of something's qualities.
thought to hold
Suggests a common belief or opinion regarding something possessing a particular attribute.
perceived to contain
Emphasizes the subjective viewpoint and the impression that something has a particular element.
believed to exhibit
Highlights the manifestation of a specific characteristic or trait that is commonly recognized.
assumed to embody
Highlights a presumptive quality or the essence of something as it is generally accepted.
understood to demonstrate
Focuses on a general understanding or perception of something showing certain qualities.
taken to include
Indicates that something is broadly accepted as part of something else.
presumed to show
Emphasizes the act of supposing something displays particular traits.
judged to encompass
Highlights a formal or considered opinion about something including or containing certain elements.
FAQs
How can I use "considered to have" in a sentence?
Use "considered to have" to indicate a general belief or widely accepted opinion about something. For example, "The ancient artifact is "considered to have" magical properties".
What are some alternatives to "considered to have"?
Alternatives include phrases like "believed to be", "regarded as", or "deemed to be", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it always necessary to specify who does the considering when using "considered to have"?
While not always necessary, specifying who holds the belief can add clarity and authority, especially in academic or professional contexts. If the belief is widely held, it can remain implicit.
What's the difference between "considered to have" and "known to have"?
"Considered to have" implies a belief or opinion, while "known to have" suggests established fact or evidence. Use "known to have" when there is verifiable proof.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested