recognised by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone or something has received acknowledgment or validation from a particular person, organization, or authority. Example: "The research was recognised by several leading scientific journals for its innovative approach."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That's not recognised by him.

Independent

It is rarely recognised by how much.

The Economist

They would not otherwise be recognised by the free market".

The Guardian

Adequate sanitation is a human right, recognised by the UN.

The Guardian

Beckham has also been recognised by the industry.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This is fully recognised by Baker and Stanley.

The Guardian

Indeed, that responsibility is recognised by our legal system.

The Guardian

Porter's achievements were recognised by a knighthood in 1983.

The Guardian

The highly autonomous RS was recognised by the peace settlement.

The Guardian

Such reservations are increasingly recognised by industry experts.

The Guardian

Same-sex unions are still not recognised by Japanese law.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "recognised by", ensure that the entity doing the recognizing is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The award was recognised by the industry leaders."

Common error

Avoid using "recognised by" without specifying who or what is doing the recognizing. This can lead to confusion or a lack of clarity. For instance, instead of saying "The importance was recognised", specify "The importance was recognised by the researchers."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognised by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject receives recognition from a specified agent. Ludwig shows this usage across varied contexts, demonstrating its role in attributing acknowledgement or validation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

33%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "recognised by" is a versatile construction used to indicate acknowledgement or validation from a specific entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and commonly employed across various domains, particularly in news, scientific literature, and general discussions. When using this phrase, clarity is paramount; specify the entity doing the recognizing to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives such as "acknowledged by" and "validated by" exist, the choice depends on the nuance you wish to convey. Overall, "recognised by" is a reliable and effective way to attribute recognition, contributing to clear and authoritative communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acknowledged by

Focuses on the act of admitting or accepting something as true or valid.

identified by

Emphasizes the act of distinguishing or recognizing something specific.

validated by

Highlights the confirmation or authentication of something's truth or correctness.

endorsed by

Implies formal approval or support from a person or organization.

approved by

Indicates official permission or acceptance.

accepted by

Suggests general agreement or belief in something.

understood by

Focuses on the comprehension or awareness of something.

noticed by

Emphasizes the act of someone observing or paying attention to something.

perceived by

Highlights the way something is interpreted or regarded by someone.

known by

Suggests that something is familiar or recognized based on established knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "recognised by" in a sentence?

Use "recognised by" to indicate that something or someone has been acknowledged or validated by a specific entity. For example, "The discovery was "recognised by" the scientific community".

What are some alternatives to "recognised by"?

Alternatives include "acknowledged by", "identified by", or "validated by", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "recognised by" and "recognized by"?

"Recognised by" is the British English spelling, while "recognized by" is the American English spelling. Both are correct, but consistency within a document is essential.

When is it appropriate to use "recognised by" in formal writing?

It's appropriate in any context where you need to specify that something has received acknowledgment or validation from a particular source. It is common in formal writing, especially in academic, scientific, and professional contexts.