Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
identified by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "identified by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying how something or someone is recognized or distinguished from others. Example: "The species is identified by its unique coloration and size."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
The journalists were not identified by name.
News & Media
The suspect was not identified by name.
News & Media
His body was identified by relatives.
News & Media
The organization was not identified by name.
News & Media
The patients were identified by first names.
News & Media
(The insects were identified by entomologists).
News & Media
The juror was not identified by name.
News & Media
He was identified by his fingerprints.
News & Media
He was identified by his fellow soldiers.
News & Media
She was not identified by name.
News & Media
He was identified by an alleged eyewitness.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "identified by", ensure the method or characteristic used for identification is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "identified by" without specifying how the identification occurred. For example, instead of "The suspect was identified", specify "The suspect was identified by DNA evidence."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "identified by" functions as a prepositional phrase that often modifies a verb, indicating the means or method through which something or someone is recognized or distinguished. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Science
45%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "identified by" is a versatile and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to specify the means of recognition or distinction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and widely applicable. Its frequency across diverse sources, including News & Media and Science, underscores its broad utility. To use it effectively, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the method of identification. While alternatives like "recognized by" and "determined by" exist, "identified by" provides a concise and direct way to convey how something is recognized.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
recognized by
Focuses on acknowledgment rather than the specific method used for identification.
determined by
Emphasizes the act of concluding or ascertaining something through investigation or calculation.
distinguished by
Highlights the unique characteristics that set something apart.
ascertained by
Stresses the process of finding something out for certain.
revealed by
Suggests that something was previously hidden or unknown but has now been uncovered.
characterized by
Focuses on the typical or notable features of something.
defined by
Highlights the essential qualities that establish the meaning or scope of something.
diagnosed by
Implies a professional or expert assessment, typically in a medical context.
located by
Emphasizes the act of finding the position or place of something.
spotted by
Suggests that something was noticed quickly or easily.
FAQs
How can I use "identified by" in a sentence?
Use "identified by" to specify the means through which someone or something is recognized. For example, "The species is "identified by" its unique coloration."
What can I say instead of "identified by"?
You can use alternatives like "recognized by", "determined by", or "distinguished by" depending on the context.
Which is correct: "identified by" or "identified through"?
Both "identified by" and "identified through" are grammatically correct. "Identified by" is generally more concise. The choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
What's the difference between "identified by" and "characterized by"?
"Identified by" focuses on the specific method or feature that allows for recognition, while "characterized by" describes the typical qualities or features of something.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested