Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
recognise by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "recognise by" is not correct in English; it should be "recognised by." You can use it when referring to someone or something being identified or acknowledged by a particular person or group.
Example: "She is recognised by her peers for her outstanding contributions to the field."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
9 human-written examples
And we should recognise by now that they know our palates rather better than we do.
News & Media
God you will still recognise by his initial cap, but he had a very narrow escape.
News & Media
We should recognise by now that regulation introduces moral hazard, raises costs, and suppresses competition and innovation, but doesn't actually prevent risk-taking or failure.
News & Media
The English attachment to jury trials is deep, long-standing and a matter of national pride, as Mr Straw seemed to recognise by arguing that, contrary to popular opinion, the right to a jury trial does not go back to the Magna Carta.
News & Media
The prescription of AD in bipolar depression appears to be another largely underestimated problem in the clinical practice and is difficult to recognise by means of traditional epidemiological methods (lay interview and structured diagnostic tools).
Science
The correct findings in lobar HPE may be more difficult to recognise by ultrasound, with definitive assessment offered by fetal MRI [26]; the anterior brain non-cleavage is less severe than in the semilobar form, with full development of the third ventricle and posterior half of the CC, variable fusion of the frontal horns and fused fornices [27].
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
51 human-written examples
That's not recognised by him.
News & Media
It is rarely recognised by how much.
News & Media
This is fully recognised by Baker and Stanley.
News & Media
Its qualities were recognised by his son, who named it.
News & Media
Being consistently recognised by outsiders may be quite another.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Replace "recognise by" with more appropriate alternatives like "identified by" or "acknowledged by" to improve clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
Avoid using the base form "recognise" with "by"; use the past participle "recognized" or "recognised" to ensure grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "recognise by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is the passive voice construction using the past participle: "recognized/recognised by." As shown in Ludwig's examples, this structure indicates that something is identified or acknowledged by someone or something else.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
60%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "recognise by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage involves using the past participle forms "recognized by" (American English) or "recognised by" (British English). As Ludwig AI highlights, this construction signifies that something is acknowledged or identified by someone or something else. This phrase commonly appears in news, media, and scientific contexts. Therefore, it's essential to use the correct past participle form to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity in writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
recognised by
Corrects the spelling from "recognise" to "recognised", using the past participle form indicating acknowledgement.
recognized by
Uses the American English spelling of the past participle form, indicating acknowledgement.
identified by
Focuses on distinguishing something based on specific characteristics.
acknowledged by
Emphasizes formal acceptance or recognition of something.
distinguished by
Highlights unique qualities that set something apart.
perceived by
Focuses on how something is understood or interpreted.
determined by
Indicates that something is decided or influenced by a particular factor.
judged by
Highlights the evaluation or assessment of something.
seen by
Simple observation or understanding.
understood by
Emphasizes comprehension or grasp of something.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "recognise" with "by"?
The correct form is either "recognised by" (British English) or "recognized by" (American English), using the past participle.
What can I say instead of "recognise by"?
Consider using phrases like "identified by" or "acknowledged by" for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives.
Is "recognise by" grammatically correct?
No, "recognise by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "recognised by" or "recognized by", using the past participle of the verb.
What's the difference between "recognise by" and "recognised by"?
"Recognise by" is grammatically incorrect. "Recognised by" is the correct form (British English), indicating that someone or something is acknowledged or identified by a particular entity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested