Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

predicted by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "predicted by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a forecast or expectation made by someone or something regarding future events or outcomes. Example: "The results of the experiment were predicted by the initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

A strange assembly... tomorrow's stars as predicted by Waterstone's.

Vaughan said the regional variations were predicted by previous studies.

News & Media

The Guardian

Te move had been widely predicted by the fashion industry.

Gravitational waves were predicted by Albert Einstein in 1916.

News & Media

The Guardian

But that catastrophe was predicted by many experts.

News & Media

The New York Times

But will the disaster scenarios predicted by commentators be realised?

In fact, it was predicted by most Arctic climate experts.

News & Media

The Guardian

The margins predicted by some of the polls are huge.

News & Media

The New Yorker

cTP was predicted by ChloroP v1.1; transmembrane domain was predicted by TMpred; DUF647 was predicted by SMART Domain.

Science

Rice

Disease status was predicted by PRS.

Such results can be predicted by Eqs.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "predicted by" when referring to outcomes that have been forecast using a specific model, theory, or expert opinion. For example, "The economic downturn was predicted by several leading economists."

Common error

Avoid using "predicted by" when describing mere possibilities or speculations. "Predicted by" implies a degree of certainty based on evidence or analysis, not just a potential outcome.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "predicted by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was forecasted or anticipated by a specific entity or method. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use across various domains, showcasing the relationship between a prediction and its source.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "predicted by" is a common and grammatically correct way to attribute a forecast or expectation to a particular source. As noted by Ludwig, its usage spans across various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related articles. While synonyms such as "forecasted by" or "anticipated by" exist, "predicted by" offers a balance of formality and clarity, making it a versatile choice for many writing scenarios. Remember to specify who or what made the prediction to ensure clarity and credibility.

FAQs

What's the difference between "predicted by" and "expected by"?

"Predicted by" typically implies a formal forecast based on data or models, while "expected by" suggests a general anticipation or belief.

How can I use "predicted by" in a sentence?

You can use it to show that an outcome was anticipated by a specific source or method. For example, "The increase in sales was predicted by the marketing team's analysis."

What are some alternatives to saying "predicted by"?

Alternatives include "forecasted by", "anticipated by", or "estimated by", depending on the context and the level of precision involved.

Is it always necessary to specify who or what "predicted by"?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the source of the prediction adds credibility and context to your statement. Omitting it might make the prediction seem baseless or vague.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: