Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Responses are converted to a percentage of scale maximum [ 36], with higher scores indicating greater wellbeing.
The percentage of scale width was calculated by dividing the MDC and CIDs by the total score range of each physical category.
The percentage of scale scores that were the minimum possible (floor) value ranged from 0.3 to 74.9%; the percentage for all multi-item measures was < 25%.
The percentage of scale scores that were the maximum possible (ceiling) value ranged from 0 to 51.3%; the percentage for all multi-item measures was < 37%.
Furthermore, to assess the extent of patients' changes after interventions detected by the SS-QOL subscales, the percentage of scale width was calculated by dividing the MDC and CIDs by the total score range of each physical category.
Similar(55)
the average applied scaling, percentage of scaled frames, and the SL and ISD statistics.
(a) Average scaling percentage, (b) percentage of scaled frames, (c) skip length (SL) statistics, (d) inter-starvation distance (ISD) statistics.
The percentage of scales (Tn) is calculated in relation to each thickness level (n).
In general, the observed high percentage of scaling successes lends strong support to the hypothesized scale structure of the SF-36v2 in patients with RA.
The finding that all other scales were associated with the two dimensions as expected and the high percentage of scaling successes for all scales, however, does support the legitimacy of generating scores for the eight scales and two summary measures using the standard algorithms.
The finding that the overall general health item (item 1) also correlated substantially with several other scales corresponds with previous studies in specific patient samples [ 9, 32, 33] which also showed the lowest percentage of scaling successes for item discriminant validity of the GH scale in these populations.
Related(18)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com