Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The regression models contained Model 1 (baseline score of scale), Model 2 (control variables) and Model 3 (the intervention).
Similar(59)
According to children's height, we divided them into three groups: short stature, normal short and normal group, then compared the score of scales by the height category.
All scores of scales and single items are transformed to a score of 0 -100, with high values indicating a high level of importance.
Table 3 shows the mean scores of scales, except for brief COPE, of three groups at each time point (T1, T2, T3, and T4).
Considerable work has been done in recent years to identify minimally important differences (MIDs) for scores of scales and subscales from several FACIT instruments.
Scale sensitivity and specificity, and the correlation between the total score of the scale and aspiration grade were analyzed.
43 SAQ-DK mean scale scores were calculated for each scale by the average score of the scaled items (range 0 100).
and body condition score of 5 7 (scale 1 9) at calving.
Participants scored nursing autonomy for sleep and sedation management as moderate; median score of 5 (scale of 0 to 10), range 7 (Canada, Greece, Sweden) to 4 (Norway, Poland).
At this stage sheep were considered 'lean' (average body condition score of 2.4, scale of 1 = emaciated, 5 = obese) [58].
Favorable attitude = ≥ 50 of the total score of (FATCOD) Scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com