noticeably lacking

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "noticeably lacking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is clearly or obviously missing or deficient in a particular aspect. Example: "The report was noticeably lacking in detailed analysis, which affected its overall credibility."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

THEY'RE noticeably lacking in the kind of decorum that teachers are supposed to have.

The New York Times

Mr. Hoffman's kitchen is noticeably lacking measurement devices, so he tastes and tweaks often.

The New York Times - Food

The core engine is impeccable, but SFV is noticeably lacking in features.

The Guardian - Tech

Heathen achieves a balance noticeably lacking in Bowie's output of the past 20 years.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The speech was noticeably lacking in details about other plans for the coming year.

The New York Times

The cohort is noticeably lacking in voice-of-a-generation types to serve as arbiters.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

Those, though, come with a comic sensibility that Brookner's noticeably lacks.

The Guardian - Books

Scotland noticeably lacks those old villages that evolved in England from medieval hamlets of joint tenants.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Already, says the SNJ's Mr Boissarie, French journalism noticeably lacks the "impertinent" tone of Britain's press.

The Economist

Unearthed police records noticeably lack any apparent link to suspected criminal activity, or any obvious payoff for public safety.

The New York Times

The BlackBerry PlayBook, the company's first tablet computer and its first QNX device, noticeably lacks apps, months after going on sale.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance the impact of "noticeably lacking", consider using strong verbs and vivid adjectives to describe the consequences or effects of the deficiency.

Common error

Avoid using "noticeably lacking" in overly casual or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "missing" or "absent" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "noticeably lacking" functions as an adjective phrase typically modifying a noun, indicating a deficiency or absence that is easily observed. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, reflected in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

34%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "noticeably lacking" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that indicates a clear absence or deficiency. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is correct and versatile across various contexts, predominantly in news and media, as well as scientific publications. When employing the phrase, consider the degree of formality required, choosing simpler alternatives like "missing" in casual settings. Remember to clearly state what is lacking and the significance of its absence for maximum impact. While numerous sources, including authoritative ones like The New York Times and The Guardian, demonstrate its usage, overusing the phrase in informal contexts should be avoided. Always consider the context and intended impact to communicate effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clearly absent

Emphasizes the absence of something in a more direct manner, focusing on its non-existence.

visibly deficient

Highlights the deficiency in a way that is easily seen or observed.

plainly missing

Indicates that something is missing in a straightforward and obvious way.

conspicuously absent

Suggests that the absence is very noticeable and attracts attention.

markedly deficient

Implies a significant level of deficiency, more than just slightly lacking.

distinctly wanting

Focuses on the idea that something is needed or desired but is clearly not present.

evidently inadequate

Indicates that something is not sufficient or suitable for the purpose, and this is clear.

patently insufficient

Stresses that the lack is undeniable and obvious, leaving no room for doubt about inadequacy.

glaringly inadequate

Emphasizes that something's inadequacy or lack is overwhelmingly obvious and hard to ignore.

appreciably scarce

Highlights that something is present, but only in a very limited quantity.

FAQs

How can I use "noticeably lacking" in a sentence?

You can use "noticeably lacking" to describe something that is clearly missing or deficient. For example: "The report was "noticeably lacking" in detailed analysis, which affected its overall credibility."

What are some alternatives to "noticeably lacking"?

You can use alternatives such as "clearly absent", "visibly deficient", or "plainly missing" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "noticeably lacking" or "clearly lacking"?

Both phrases are correct, but ""noticeably lacking"" might imply a more significant or surprising absence compared to "clearly lacking", which simply states a fact.

What's the difference between "noticeably lacking" and "conspicuously absent"?

"Noticeably lacking" suggests something is deficient, whereas "conspicuously absent" indicates a prominent absence. The former focuses on a deficiency, while the latter highlights the obvious absence of something.