conspicuously absent

USAGE SUMMARY

'conspicuously absent' is a correct and usable expression in written English.
It means something that is obvious for its absence or lack, and it can be used in many different contexts. For example, "The singer's enthusiasm was conspicuously absent from her performance tonight."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Gloria was conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

France was conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

(Ms. Zoe was conspicuously absent).

The New York Times

Conspicuously absent from the coalition?

The New York Times

Nico's name was conspicuously absent.

The Washington Post

But Nouvel was conspicuously absent.

The Guardian - Arts

Luxury goods are conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

Lehman Brothers was conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

But he is conspicuously absent.

The New York Times - Magazine

Their voices are conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

These behaviors are conspicuously absent from the Generative quadrant.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "conspicuously absent" when you want to emphasize that something's absence is noticeable and potentially meaningful. This highlights not just the lack but also its significance.

Common error

While versatile, avoid overuse in highly formal or academic writing. In such contexts, consider more precise synonyms like 'notably absent' or 'markedly absent' for a more professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conspicuously absent" functions as an adverbial modifier intensifying the adjective 'absent'. It describes the manner in which something is missing, emphasizing that the absence is easily noticeable and often significant. Ludwig examples showcase various scenarios where it's used to highlight notable absences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

26%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Reference

4%

Wiki

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conspicuously absent" is a commonly used and grammatically sound phrase that effectively highlights a noticeable absence. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, and examples from Ludwig show it appears across diverse contexts such as news reporting, scientific articles, and business communications. While versatile, it's important to consider the context and purpose when using this phrase, ensuring it appropriately conveys the significance of the absence. Alternatives like "noticeably missing" or "markedly absent" might be preferable in more formal settings. When used correctly, "conspicuously absent" is a valuable tool for drawing attention to meaningful omissions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

noticeably missing

Emphasizes the act of something or someone being currently missed or lacking.

plainly missing

Highlights the obvious absence of someone or something.

markedly absent

Underscores how the absence is striking and significant.

visibly lacking

Focuses on a deficiency that is easy to see or detect.

ostensibly gone

Suggests that the absence is apparent but might not be entirely genuine or permanent.

glaringly absent

Indicates that the absence is extremely obvious and hard to ignore.

patently lacking

Emphasizes that the deficiency is undeniable and clear.

evidently absent

Implies that the absence is clear based on the available evidence.

distinctly missing

Highlights the particular clarity or emphasis of the absence.

significantly absent

Indicates that the absence has important consequences or implications.

FAQs

How can I use "conspicuously absent" in a sentence?

Use "conspicuously absent" to describe something or someone whose absence is very noticeable or remarkable. For example, 'The main speaker was "conspicuously absent" from the conference'.

What are some alternatives to "conspicuously absent"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "noticeably missing", "plainly missing", or "markedly absent".

Is it better to say "conspicuously absent" or "obviously absent"?

"Conspicuously absent" suggests the absence is significant and noteworthy, while "obviously absent" simply points out a clear absence. The best choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the importance of the absence.

What does "conspicuously absent" imply about the thing or person missing?

It implies that the absence is not just a simple lack but is remarkable, often suggesting that the missing entity is expected or should logically be present. The phrase draws attention to the absence and its potential implications.