not mentioned at all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not mentioned at all" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate that something has been completely omitted or overlooked in a discussion or text. For example: "The report was thorough, but the budget was not mentioned at all." Alternative expressions include "not referenced at all" and "not addressed at all."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Brighton Beach is not mentioned at all.

The New York Times

The good is often buried, or not mentioned at all.

The Guardian - Opinion

No names yet from Khan, with Musharraf's not mentioned at all.

The Guardian - Opinion

In his, The Third Floor Front, she is not mentioned at all.

The Guardian

Some key events in Mrs. Clinton's life are not mentioned at all.

The New York Times

It would be mentioned in sex manuals without emphasis, or not mentioned at all.

The Guardian - Books

It is not mentioned at all in her entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.

The Guardian

Balls was mentioned three times, while Ed Miliband was not mentioned at all.

The Guardian

In fact Bin Laden, who is still at large, was not mentioned at all, and al-Qaida only in passing.

The Guardian

Of the other Labour leadership candidates, Diane Abbott is not mentioned at all and Andy Burnham only once.

The Guardian

But Arthur Andersen came up only once, and State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, patron saint of greed-busters, was not mentioned at all (and in an election year!).

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In academic or scientific writing, this phrase is effective for pointing out gaps in previous research or literature reviews.

Common error

Do not combine 'at all' with other absolute intensifiers like 'completely' or 'totally' (e.g., 'completely not mentioned at all'). While "not mentioned at all" is perfectly idiomatic, adding extra modifiers can make the sentence feel cluttered and overly defensive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not mentioned at all" functions as a passive verb phrase modified by an emphatic adverbial. As observed in Ludwig's data, it is frequently used to provide a stark contrast between what is expected in a text and what is actually present.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

32%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

According to Ludwig AI, "not mentioned at all" is a robust and highly versatile phrase used across a spectrum of professional and academic discourses. It excels at providing emphasis where a simple negative might be too weak. Whether used in a "News & Media" context to point out a politician's oversight or in "Science" to indicate missing experimental variables, it remains a clear and authoritative choice. For a more formal tone, alternatives like "completely omitted" can be used, but for general clarity and impact, the main query is hard to beat.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not addressed at all

Shifts focus from the act of naming to the act of dealing with a topic

completely omitted

More formal and suggests a deliberate or systematic exclusion

left out entirely

A more common, slightly less formal phrasing

given no mention

Places emphasis on the lack of attention given to the subject

never referenced

Focuses on the lack of citation or allusion

not cited whatsoever

Uses a different emphatic modifier to indicate zero occurrence

entirely absent

Focuses on the state of the information rather than the act of mentioning

passed over in silence

A more literary or idiomatic way to describe an omission

skipped over

Informal; implies a lack of thoroughness or an intentional bypass

unaccounted for

Suggests that the missing information is a discrepancy or a failure in reporting

FAQs

How do I use "not mentioned at all" in a sentence?

You can use it to highlight a total omission, such as: "Despite the lengthy report, the environmental impact was "not mentioned at all"."

What is the difference between "not mentioned" and "not mentioned at all"?

While both indicate absence, adding "at all" provides emphasis, suggesting that the omission is absolute or perhaps unexpected compared to simply being "not mentioned".

Can I use "not mentioned at all" in formal writing?

Yes, it is widely accepted in formal contexts. In professional reports, you might also consider "not addressed at all" or "completely omitted" for variety.

Is "not mentioned at all" better than "unmentioned"?

The phrase "not mentioned at all" is usually more natural in active or passive sentence structures, whereas "unmentioned" often acts as a simple adjective.