not incorporated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not incorporated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has not been included or formally integrated into a larger entity or system. Example: "The new policy changes were proposed but not incorporated into the final document."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Yahoo! was not incorporated to fix China".

Forbes

Sunday is therefore not incorporated in the STB interview.

Crime Science

In fact, many certified B Corps are not incorporated as benefit corporation under State law.

TechCrunch

OBJECTIVE Most predictive models of kidney disease progression have not incorporated structural data.

Duke University

Brookings was not incorporated until 1951.

Wikipedia

We have not incorporated this wisdom into our aesthetic.

Huffington Post

Initially an agricultural settlement, Moncton was not incorporated until 1855.

Wikipedia

It has not incorporated new science, yours included!, into a much-needed and long overdue revision.

Huffington Post

Keep in mind that If your business is not incorporated, it technically passes when you do.

HuffPost

It's not incorporated as a nonprofit, but he told me that they "operate as close to it as we can".

Vice

Finally, most traffic pollution models have not incorporated wind direction.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not incorporated", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking integration or inclusion. For example, specify the system, plan, or entity it is excluded from.

Common error

Avoid using "not incorporated" when a simpler phrase like "not included" suffices. Overusing technical language can make your writing sound unnecessarily complex.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not incorporated" functions as a negative passive participle phrase, indicating that something has not been integrated or included into something else. This is evident from the examples provided by Ludwig, where it describes a lack of integration in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

29%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Academia

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not incorporated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a lack of inclusion or integration. According to Ludwig, it finds common application across diverse fields, including science, news, and business, as presented in Ludwig's examples. While often used in formal contexts, it maintains a neutral tone. Remember to clearly specify what isn't integrated when using this phrase. Although simpler terms like "not included" may suffice in certain situations, understanding its nuanced use ensures clarity in conveying the intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not included

Focuses on the simple absence of something from a group or list.

not integrated

Emphasizes a lack of blending or unification with something else.

not part of

Highlights that something is separate from a larger whole.

not featured

Implies that something was deliberately left out or not showcased.

not embodied

Suggests that a concept or idea is not represented in a tangible form.

not encompassed

Indicates that something falls outside the scope or boundaries of a system.

not comprised

Highlights the composition of something and the absence of a specific element.

not woven into

Suggests a lack of intricate connection or integration within a complex structure.

not assimilated

Emphasizes the failure to absorb or integrate something into a larger group.

not subsumed

Highlights a hierarchical structure where something is not placed under a larger category.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "not incorporated" to sound more formal?

Consider using phrases such as "not integrated", "not included", or "not encompassed" depending on the specific context. These options often carry a more formal tone.

Is "not incorporated" grammatically correct?

Yes, "not incorporated" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English grammar rules as confirmed by Ludwig AI, and is commonly used in various writing contexts.

What's the difference between "not incorporated" and "not included"?

While both phrases indicate exclusion, "not incorporated" often implies a lack of integration into a larger system or entity, while "not included" simply means it's not part of a group or list. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How to use "not incorporated" in a sentence?

You can use "not incorporated" to indicate that something hasn't been integrated or included into something else, like: "The new policy changes were proposed but "not incorporated" into the final document."