not immune to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not immune to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something is susceptible to a particular influence, condition, or effect. Example: "Even the most experienced professionals are not immune to making mistakes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

NEA Was Not Immune To Mistakes.

Forbes

I'm not immune to the complacency.

The New York Times

Beijing is not immune to pressure.

The New York Times

And Britain is not immune to this.

The Economist

But he is not immune to pressure.

The New York Times

Politicians are not immune to Twitter bickering.

The New York Times

We're not immune to anything".

The New York Times - Sports

I'm not immune to that.

The Guardian - Books

Pohlad Sr. was not immune to glamour.

The New York Times - Magazine

ITV is not immune to commercial pressures.

The Guardian

Artists themselves are not immune to bunk.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not immune to", ensure the context clearly indicates what the subject is vulnerable to. Be specific about the potential impact or effect to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "not immune to" in excessively broad or vague statements. Instead of saying "Humans are not immune to problems", specify the type of problems you are referring to, such as "Humans are not immune to stress-related health issues".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not immune to" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a lack of resistance or susceptibility. Ludwig AI confirms this through numerous examples where the phrase describes vulnerability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

79%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not immune to" is a versatile and frequently used phrase indicating susceptibility or vulnerability. As Ludwig AI explains, it is grammatically correct and applicable across various contexts, from news and media to scientific discourse. While it is generally safe to use, specificity enhances clarity. Remember to consider alternatives like "susceptible to" or "vulnerable to" based on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

susceptible to

Replaces the negative "not immune" with a direct statement of vulnerability.

vulnerable to

Similar to "susceptible", emphasizing a weakness or exposure to harm.

prone to

Indicates a tendency or likelihood of being affected by something.

open to

Suggests a lack of protection or resistance, allowing something to penetrate or affect.

subject to

Implies that something is under the control or influence of something else.

at risk of

Highlights the potential danger or negative consequences of exposure.

defenseless against

Emphasizes a lack of ability to resist or protect oneself from something.

liable to

Indicates a legal or formal responsibility or susceptibility.

can't avoid

Focuses on the inevitability of experiencing something.

receptive to

Suggests a willingness or openness to being influenced by something.

FAQs

How can I use "not immune to" in a sentence?

You can use "not immune to" to indicate that someone or something is susceptible to a particular influence, condition, or effect. For example, "Even experienced professionals are "not immune to" making mistakes."

What are some alternatives to "not immune to"?

You can use alternatives such as "susceptible to", "vulnerable to", or "prone to", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "immune to" or "not immune to"?

It depends on what you want to convey. "Immune to" means unaffected or protected, while "not immune to" means susceptible or vulnerable. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "not immune to" and "unaffected by"?

"Not immune to" implies that something can still be influenced or harmed, while "unaffected by" suggests a complete lack of impact or influence. For example, saying someone is "not immune to" criticism means they can still be affected by it, while saying they are unaffected by criticism implies it has no impact on them.