not exempt from

USAGE SUMMARY

"not exempt from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is included, or not excluded, from a particular category or set of rules. Example: All students are not exempt from taking the final exam.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

China is not exempt from this problem.

The Economist

France is not exempt from this reality.

The New Yorker

Ultimately, theatre is not exempt from fashion.

The New Yorker

The church was not exempt from this.

Columbia University

Princeton was not exempt from this enthusiasm.

Princeton University

You are not exempt from bills all of a sudden.

Independent

Business travellers are not exempt from its repercussions.

The Economist

Manhattan, of course, is not exempt from these trends.

The New Yorker

News organizations are not exempt from criticism, either.

The New York Times

Tebow, to a degree, is not exempt from culpability.

The New York Times - Sports

Law enforcement is not exempt from such concerns.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not exempt from" to clearly state that a rule, obligation, or condition applies to a specific subject, ensuring there are no perceived exceptions. This enhances clarity and avoids potential misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid using "not exempt from" when a more direct phrasing is possible. Sometimes, simply stating the obligation or condition is clearer and more concise than using the double negative. For example, instead of "Students are not exempt from attending classes", write "Students must attend classes".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not exempt from" functions as a qualifier. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates that something is included, or not excluded, from a particular category or set of rules. It sets a limitation, specifying that something is subject to a certain requirement or condition.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Academia

31%

Science

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not exempt from" is a phrase used to indicate that a rule, obligation, or condition applies to someone or something without exception. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in written English. As demonstrated by Ludwig, its versatility is evident through its widespread presence in news, academic, and scientific domains. Remember to ensure clarity by directly stating the obligation where possible, and consider alternatives like "subject to" depending on the nuance you wish to convey. While common, it's essential to use this phrase accurately to avoid ambiguity and ensure clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to

Emphasizes being under the authority or control of something.

bound by

Highlights the restrictive nature of a rule or law.

liable to

Focuses on the potential for negative consequences or obligations.

accountable for

Stresses responsibility and the need to answer for one's actions.

within the scope of

Indicates inclusion in a defined area or set of rules.

not immune to

Focuses on the lack of protection from something, often negative.

cannot avoid

Highlights the inevitability of experiencing or being affected by something.

required to

Emphasizes the mandatory nature of an action or obligation.

in compliance with

Highlights the adherence to a set of rules or regulations.

under the jurisdiction of

Specifies the authority or power that something is subject to.

FAQs

How can I use "not exempt from" in a sentence?

Use "not exempt from" to specify that a particular entity or group is subject to a rule or condition that might otherwise be perceived as optional. For example, "Even senior employees are "subject to" the new attendance policy".

What are some alternatives to "not exempt from"?

You can use phrases like ""subject to"", "bound by", or "liable to" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. "Subject to" implies being under the authority or control of something.

Is it better to use "not exempt from" or a more direct positive statement?

In many cases, a direct positive statement is clearer and more concise. For example, instead of saying "Volunteers are not exempt from background checks", it's often better to say "Volunteers must undergo background checks".

What's the difference between "not exempt from" and "not immune to"?

"Not exempt from" implies a lack of exception from a rule or obligation, while "not immune to" suggests a lack of protection or resistance against something, often negative. For example, "The company is not exempt from taxes" versus "The city is not immune to economic downturns".