no mentioned

USAGE SUMMARY

No mentioned is not grammatically correct in written English. To use it, you would want to restructure the phrase into something like "not mentioned" or "not mentioned anywhere." For example, "The report did not mention any risks associated with the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

But happily, the tool "Inner Authority" teaches me how to confront Gramps and other tormentors (like Gramps, for example; no, mentioned him) while teamed up with my Shadow.

The New York Times - Books

A male patient, 66 years old, with no mentioned cardiovascular disease was submitted to an elective surgical correction of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

No names mentioned.

The New York Times

No one mentioned Iraq.

The Economist

No one mentioned "Fandango".

The New Yorker

No leeks mentioned.

Independent

No one mentioned pay.

The Guardian - Books

No one mentioned Aids.

The Guardian

No one mentioned race.

The New York Times

No one mentioned this.

The Guardian - Arts

No one mentioned the abuse.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "no mentioned" in formal writing. Replace it with grammatically correct alternatives such as "not mentioned", "was not mentioned", or "is not mentioned".

Common error

A common mistake is using "no" as a direct substitute for "not" before a past participle. Always ensure the verb phrase is correctly formed, for example, using "not mentioned" instead of "no mentioned".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no mentioned" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't function as a standard grammatical unit in English. It attempts to express the absence of mention but fails to do so correctly, as noted by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no mentioned" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's better to use phrases like "not mentioned", "was not mentioned", or "is not mentioned" to convey the intended meaning accurately. While it might appear in some sources, its usage is generally an error. Remember to prioritize correct grammar for clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not mentioned

This is the most direct and grammatically sound replacement.

was not mentioned

Adds explicit tense, clarifying that something was omitted in the past.

is not mentioned

Indicates something is currently absent from discussion.

no reference to

Focuses on the absence of a specific reference.

no indication of

Highlights the lack of an indication or sign.

noted nowhere

Emphasizes the complete absence of something in records.

nowhere stated

Highlights that something hasn't been explicitly stated.

not alluded to

Focuses on the lack of indirect reference.

omitted from discussion

Highlights a deliberate absence from the discussion.

unspecified

Indicates a lack of specific details, implying omission.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the idea of "no mentioned" in a sentence?

Instead of "no mentioned", use the correct grammatical form "not mentioned". For example, instead of "There was no mentioned of that", say "That was not mentioned".

What is a more formal alternative to "no mentioned"?

Formal alternatives include phrases like "no reference to" or "no indication of", which are grammatically correct and suitable for academic or professional contexts.

Is "no mentioned" ever considered acceptable in English?

The phrase "no mentioned" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. While it might occasionally appear in informal speech or non-edited text, it's best to avoid it in formal contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its incorrectness.

Which is the difference between "not mentioned" and "unspecified"?

"Not mentioned" indicates that something was omitted from a discussion or document, whereas "unspecified" means that something lacks specific details but may still be present in a general sense.