no indication of

USAGE SUMMARY

"no indication of" is correct and can be used in written English.
Example: The doctor examined the patient's x-rays, but there was no indication of any broken bones.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The documents contain no indication of wrongdoing.

The New York Times

But there's no indication of ownership.

The New York Times - Magazine

This trend shows no indication of reversing.

University of California, Berkeley

There is no indication of electrode fouling.

Electrochimica Acta

No indication of crazing was detected.

Polymer

No indication of toxicity was found.

Biomaterials

"There was no indication of major injury".

The New York Times

No indication of price was given today.

The New York Times

Cost is no indication of quality.

The New York Times - Health

There was no indication of a motive.

The Guardian

No indication of national security concern.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no indication of", ensure the statement is followed by a clear explanation of what lacks indication. This provides context and strengthens the assertion.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "no indication of" something automatically proves the opposite. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Further investigation might be necessary.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no indication of" functions as a qualifier or negator, expressing the absence of evidence, signs, or hints towards a particular condition or event. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness. Similar examples in Ludwig showcase its utility in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

38%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no indication of" is a versatile phrase used to express the absence of evidence or signs pointing toward a specific outcome or condition. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across varied contexts like News & Media, Science, and Academia. While suggesting the absence of something, it's crucial to remember that "no indication" doesn't equate to proof of absence. Therefore, it's essential to avoid drawing unwarranted conclusions based solely on the lack of indication. Related phrases like "lack of evidence for" or "no sign of" can provide nuanced alternatives, enriching the writer's vocabulary. Always provide context to what lacks indication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no sign of

Implies the complete absence of any sign that something exists or has occurred.

no hint of

Suggests that there is absolutely no trace or subtle indication.

no suggestion of

Indicates that there is no hint or implication of something.

lack of evidence for

Focuses on the absence of proof or supporting information.

absence of signs of

Highlights the non-existence of observable signs or clues.

nothing to suggest

Expresses that there is no basis or reason to believe something.

no evidence suggesting

Emphasizes the lack of evidence that points towards a particular conclusion.

complete absence of

Highlights the thorough and total lack of something.

no presumption of

Focuses on the absence of assuming something to be the case.

without a trace of

Implies that something is completely missing, leaving no residue or indication.

FAQs

How can I use "no indication of" in a sentence?

Use "no indication of" to express the absence of evidence or signs for a particular situation or condition. For example, "There was "no indication of" foul play at the scene."

What are some alternatives to saying "no indication of"?

Alternatives include "lack of evidence for", "absence of signs of", or "no sign of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "no indication of" or "no evidence of"?

Both phrases are correct, but "no evidence of" might be preferred in more formal or legal contexts, while "no indication of" can be used more broadly.

What does it mean when someone says there is "no indication of" a problem?

It means that there are no apparent signs or symptoms that suggest a problem exists. However, it does not definitively rule out the possibility of a problem; further investigation may still be warranted.