no explanation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no explanation" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where there is a lack of information or understanding about something. Example: The teacher gave us a difficult math problem with no explanation, leaving us all confused and frustrated.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No explanation.

The New York Times

No explanation was offered.

The New York Times

No explanation is definitive.

The Economist

No explanation, just reiteration.

The New York Times - Books

Iran gave no explanation.

The New York Times

He offered no explanation.

The New York Times

I have no explanation.

The New Yorker

But no explanation came.

The New Yorker

No explanation given.

The New York Times - Travel

No letter, no explanation.

The New Yorker

Moyer has no explanation.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no explanation", ensure the context clearly implies what needs explaining. Avoid ambiguity by specifying the subject or situation lacking an explanation.

Common error

While "no explanation" is acceptable, overuse can make your writing sound simplistic. In formal or academic contexts, consider more sophisticated alternatives such as "without detailed rationale" or "lacking sufficient justification" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no explanation" primarily functions as a noun phrase. It typically serves as the object of a verb or preposition, indicating the absence of an explanation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Formal & Business

17%

Science

8%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Academia

2%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no explanation" is grammatically sound and very commonly used to indicate a lack of clarity or justification. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage. It frequently appears in News & Media, Formal & Business contexts, serving to express the absence of reasons or details. When writing, it’s important to ensure that the context clearly implies what needs explaining, and in formal writing consider alternatives to avoid sounding simplistic. Related phrases include without clarification and unexplained. Be aware about the overusing this phrase in formal writing as it might make it simplistic, and in those cases consider using more sophisticated options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unexplained

Simply states that something has not been explained.

without a reason

A more direct and simple way to express the absence of a reason.

no justification offered

Specifically points out that there was no attempt to provide justification.

no account given

Focuses on the lack of a descriptive explanation of events.

without clarification

Focuses on the absence of clarifying details.

lacking a rationale

Highlights the absence of underlying reasons or justification.

devoid of reasons

Emphasizes the complete absence of any reasoning.

without grounds

Indicates that there is no foundation or basis for something.

unsubstantiated

Highlights the lack of supporting evidence or confirmation.

inexplicable

Describes something as being beyond understanding or explanation.

FAQs

How can I use "no explanation" in a sentence?

You can use "no explanation" to indicate that there was no reason given for something. For example, "The project was abruptly cancelled with "no explanation"."

What are some alternatives to using "no explanation"?

Alternatives to "no explanation" include phrases like "without clarification", "unexplained", or "no justification offered", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean when someone provides "no explanation"?

When someone provides "no explanation", it typically means they have not offered any reasons, details, or justifications for their actions or decisions. This can create confusion or frustration for those affected.

Is it better to say "no explanation was given" or "there was no explanation"?

Both "no explanation was given" and "there was no explanation" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably. The choice often depends on personal preference or the desired emphasis within the sentence.