no agreement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no agreement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that there is a lack of consensus or a formal arrangement between parties. Example: "After several discussions, it became clear that there was no agreement on the terms of the contract."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No agreement?

The Washington Post

No agreement was reached.

The New York Times

But there was no agreement.

The New York Times

We have no agreement.

The Guardian - Opinion

"There's been no agreement.

The New York Times

No agreement, no leave.

The Guardian - Opinion

No agreement was reached in Copenhagen.

The Economist

The actual meetings produced no agreement.

Encyclopedia Britannica

So far there has been no agreement.

The New York Times

"No agreement has been reached," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

But there is no agreement yet.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no agreement", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific points or issues lack agreement. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

While "no agreement" is generally acceptable, in very informal settings, consider using more casual alternatives like "didn't see eye to eye" or "couldn't come to terms" for a more natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no agreement" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often used as a subject complement or object in a sentence. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability, indicating a lack of consensus or a formal arrangement between parties.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no agreement" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote the absence of consensus or a formal arrangement. As verified by Ludwig, it functions primarily as a noun phrase and serves to communicate a lack of mutual understanding on a given subject. Its usage spans various contexts, from formal news reports to academic discussions, maintaining a neutral register. While highly versatile, it's advisable to ensure contextual clarity when using "no agreement", and to consider alternative phrases for more casual communication. Ludwig’s examples showcase the broad applicability of this phrase across diverse domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no consensus reached

A direct synonym emphasizing the process of seeking agreement.

lack of consensus

Emphasizes the absence of general agreement among a group.

no deal

A more informal way to express that an arrangement could not be made.

failure to concur

A more formal way of saying there was no agreement.

failure to settle

Focuses on the inability to resolve a dispute or reach an understanding.

deadlock

Highlights a situation where progress is impossible due to disagreement.

stalemate

Similar to deadlock, suggesting a standstill due to opposing forces.

discord

Implies a lack of harmony and agreement.

dissent

Focuses on the expression of disagreement.

opposition

Highlights active resistance and disagreement.

FAQs

What does "no agreement" mean?

"No agreement" signifies a lack of consensus or mutual understanding between two or more parties on a particular matter.

How can I use "no agreement" in a sentence?

You can use "no agreement" to indicate a failure to reach a deal, understanding, or consensus. For example, "After several meetings, there was "no agreement" on the budget allocation."

What are some alternatives to saying "no agreement"?

Alternatives include "lack of consensus", "failure to concur", or "no consensus reached", depending on the level of formality required.

Is it better to say "there is no agreement" or "there are no agreements"?

The choice depends on the context. "There is "no agreement"" is used when referring to a general lack of consensus on a specific issue. "There are "no agreements"" is used when referring to multiple specific arrangements that do not exist.