lack of consensus

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lack of consensus" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where there is no agreement or shared opinion among a group of people. Example: "The committee's decision was delayed due to a lack of consensus on the proposed changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Lack of consensus reigns.

The Guardian - Opinion

3. Lack of consensus will slow change.

Columbia University

The lack of consensus doesn't mean we should do nothing.

The Washington Post

This led to lack of consensus in RT volumes.

Practical Radiation Oncology

Theses considerations have led to a lack of consensus.

EMC - Stomatologie

The rarity of LMS has led to a lack of consensus regarding appropriate treatment.

Stanford University

But they share two things: bad blood and a lack of consensus.

The New York Times

The lack of consensus in Congress puts Mr. Obama in a tricky domestic and diplomatic bind.

The New York Times - Science

The lack of consensus did not seem to upset other scientists.

The New York Times

Despite a lack of consensus about the funds, they have attracted a flood of money.

The New York Times

"The lack of consensus among our group is itself, for me, confirmation of this conclusion".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "lack of consensus", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific issue or topic lacks agreement. This helps prevent ambiguity and strengthens the statement's impact.

Common error

Avoid using "lack of consensus" when there is only a minor disagreement or a small subset of individuals who disagree. Ensure that the disagreement is significant enough to warrant the phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of consensus" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. Ludwig examples demonstrate its role in describing the absence of agreement on a topic, indicating a state of disagreement or division.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lack of consensus" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to denote the absence of a unified agreement. According to Ludwig AI, it's prevalent across various domains like science, news, and academia. While alternatives such as "absence of agreement" or "disagreement among members" exist, "lack of consensus" succinctly captures the state of differing opinions. Usage tips emphasize the importance of clearly defining the scope of disagreement to avoid ambiguity. Analysis reveals a neutral to formal register, fitting for professional discussions. Overall, "lack of consensus" serves as a valuable tool for articulating division or indecision in various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absence of agreement

Emphasizes the non-existence of an accord.

disagreement among members

Highlights the discord within a group.

divergence of opinion

Focuses on the differing viewpoints.

split decision

Indicates a divided outcome.

no unanimity

Directly states the absence of complete agreement.

divided opinion

Highlights how an opinion is split.

failure to agree

Focuses on the inability to reach an agreement.

discordance

Emphasizes the disharmony and lack of alignment.

varying perspectives

Highlights that different people have different perspectives.

absence of accord

Highlights the absence of a shared agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "lack of consensus" in a sentence?

You can use "lack of consensus" to describe situations where there is no general agreement on a particular issue. For instance, "The project was delayed due to a "lack of consensus" among the stakeholders".

What are some alternatives to "lack of consensus"?

Alternatives include "absence of agreement", "disagreement among members", or "divergence of opinion". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "lack of consensus" or "absence of consensus"?

"Lack of consensus" and "absence of consensus" are largely interchangeable. "Lack of consensus" might be slightly more common, but both are grammatically correct and convey the same meaning.

What does "lack of consensus" imply in decision-making?

In decision-making, "lack of consensus" often implies that a decision may be delayed, require further negotiation, or be made by a smaller group with authority, rather than reflecting the entire group's agreement.