negative implication for

USAGE SUMMARY

'negative implication for' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to the consequences or potential outcomes of an event, situation, or action, which could be undesirable or unfavorable. For example: The scandal had a negative implication for the company's reputation.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The E.U. economic and monetary affairs commissioner, Olli Rehn, said the vote Wednesday "will not have any negative implication for the disbursement of the installments of the loan".

The New York Times

Focusing on the anatomy and physiology of the pain transmission system, Valerie Hardcastle (1997) urges a similar negative implication for a popular methodological assumption.

SEP

Secondly, the phrase "to personally cultivate" had negative implication for women since it had been directly translated to mean using oxen for plowing, which is culturally forbidden for women.

Environmental Systems Research

Instead of using as a soil fertility amendment, burning cattle dung for domestic energy source-therefore has negative implication for agricultural productivity especially for developing country like Ethiopia-importing fertilizer from abroad.

Environmental Systems Research

Thus while public sector HIV clinic services and tuberculosis treatment are free at the point of use in South Africa, patient costs might still pose barriers that could limit universal access to care and could have negative implication for patient retention and adherence.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

But it could have negative implications for the car industry.

The New York Times

The Office for Budget Responsibility warns it could have negative implications for business and consumer confidence.

The Guardian

But it would also have very negative implications for the rest of the United Kingdom as well.

The Guardian

High seat sales have some negative implications for vacation travelers who fly on discount airlines.

The New York Times - Travel

Anthropologists say tourism in its worst forms carries negative implications for the Himba.

The New York Times - Travel

Protracted weakness could evolve into stagnation with negative implications for the global economy".

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the strength of the implication. If the effect is severe, stronger language like "detrimental effect" or "harmful impact" might be more appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "negative implication for" when a situation presents only minor inconveniences. Reserve it for scenarios with genuinely adverse consequences to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negative implication for" functions as a noun phrase acting as a prepositional complement. It describes something as having potentially adverse or unfavorable results for someone or something else. Ludwig's examples confirm its usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "negative implication for" is used to denote potentially unfavorable outcomes or consequences stemming from a particular situation or action. While grammatically sound and understandable, as Ludwig AI confirms, it is less frequently used than alternatives like "negative impact on" or "adverse consequence for". Primarily found in news and scientific contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. When employing this phrase, clarity about the affected subject and careful consideration of the severity of the implication are essential for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adverse consequence for

Replaces "implication" with "consequence" and "negative" with "adverse", emphasizing the detrimental result.

negative consequences on

It is a more direct and common alternative, replacing "implication for" with "consequences on".

detrimental effect on

Substitutes "negative implication" with "detrimental effect", highlighting the harmful impact.

unfavorable outcome for

Replaces "implication" with "outcome" and "negative" with "unfavorable", focusing on the undesirable result.

harmful impact on

Emphasizes the damaging nature of the effect, using stronger language than "negative implication".

adverse repercussions for

Uses "repercussions" to denote the consequences, implying a wider and more lasting impact.

downside risk for

It uses business-specific terminology, replacing "implication for" with the idiom "downside risk for".

unwelcome result for

More informal and less direct than "negative implication", and can be used to soften the negative impact.

poor outlook for

Focuses on future prospects and can be applicable in contexts where the implications affect long-term success.

negative side effect for

Replaces implication with side effect, and can be utilized when the negative effect is a byproduct of something.

FAQs

How can I use "negative implication for" in a sentence?

Use "negative implication for" to describe potential unfavorable outcomes. For example, "The budget cuts have a "negative implication for" education." The phrase connects an action or event with its possible undesirable result.

What are some alternatives to "negative implication for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "adverse consequence for", "detrimental effect on", or "unfavorable outcome for".

Is it better to say "negative impact for" or "negative implication for"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "negative impact for" is more direct and commonly used. "Negative implication for" suggests a potential or indirect consequence.

What is the difference between "negative implication for" and "negative consequence for"?

While similar, ""negative implication for"" often refers to a potential or suggested outcome, whereas "negative consequence for" usually indicates a more direct and realized result.