negative impact for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "negative impact for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used when discussing the adverse effects of something on a particular subject or situation, but the preposition "for" is not appropriate in this context. Example: "The new policy has a negative impact on employee morale."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"That has a more negative impact for boys.

The Guardian

The cut in production "will have a negative impact for Chrysler, but it has a negative impact for its suppliers, too," said John Casesa, an analyst at Merrill Lynch.

The New York Times

However, we suspect that the loss of the AAA rating would have only limited negative impact for the UK economy.

The Guardian - Business

First, government support to the housing market far outweighs any negative impact for banks.

The New York Times

There is some negative impact for the whole of the fashion sector.

Independent

"If government takes serious steps to bring the budget into balance that's gong to have a negative impact for household income.

The Guardian

The results included a negative impact for special items of $35 million, or 3 cents a share.

The New York Times

But cuts on the scale of the House Republicans' package, he added, would have a "negative impact for the immediate economy" that offsets any benefits.

The New York Times

In 2011, a large petrochemical complex in Taiwan incurred several fire and explosion accidents, which had considerable negative impact for the industry on both environmental and safety issues.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) have been associated with off-flavour problems in fish and seafood products, generating a strong negative impact for aquaculture industries.

Water Research

We define an injury degree to evaluate the possible negative impact for candidate placements, and we propose a least injury first approach for solving the rectangle packing problem.

European Journal of Operational Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "negative impact on" instead of "negative impact for" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using the preposition "for" after "negative impact". The correct preposition to use is "on". For example, say "The policy has a "negative impact on" the economy" not "The policy has a "negative impact for" the economy."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negative impact for" functions as a descriptor indicating an adverse influence or effect. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the preposition usage is not grammatically correct in standard English, which prefers "negative impact on".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

40%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "negative impact for" is frequently used across various contexts, including news, science, and academia, it's crucial to recognize that it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the proper phrasing is "negative impact on". This correction ensures clarity and credibility in your writing. Though prevalent, relying on "negative impact for" can detract from the overall quality of your communication. Remember to use alternatives like "negative effect on" or "adverse impact on" for more grammatically sound and professional expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

negative effect on

Replaces "impact for" with the more grammatically sound "effect on".

adverse impact on

Substitutes "negative" with "adverse" and adjusts the preposition to "on" for improved grammatical correctness.

detrimental effect on

Uses "detrimental" to emphasize the harm caused, while also correcting the preposition.

harmful influence on

Replaces both "impact" and "negative" with alternative terms that convey the same meaning with better grammar.

damaging consequences for

Shifts the focus to the results, using "consequences" instead of "impact", while retaining "for".

negative ramifications for

Uses "ramifications" to denote the extended consequences, keeping "for".

adverse repercussions for

Employs "repercussions" to indicate the effects, preserving "for".

negative implications for

Focuses on what is implied or suggested as a result, maintaining "for".

unfavorable outcome for

Highlights the result, using "outcome" in place of "impact", keeping "for".

negative downsides for

Emphasizes the disadvantages, using "downsides" to replace "impact", keeping "for".

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "negative impact for"?

The grammatically correct way to express this idea is to use "negative impact on". For example, instead of saying "The budget cuts will have a "negative impact for" schools", say "The budget cuts will have a "negative impact on" schools".

What can I say instead of "negative impact for"?

You can use alternatives such as "negative effect on", "adverse impact on", or "detrimental effect on", depending on the context. All of these phrases are grammatically sound and convey a similar meaning.

Which is correct, "negative impact for" or "negative impact on"?

"Negative impact on" is the correct and grammatically preferred phrase. "Negative impact for" is generally considered incorrect in standard English.

How to use "negative impact on" in a sentence?

Use "negative impact on" to describe how something adversely affects something else. For example: "The new regulations will have a "negative impact on" small businesses".