needs to be eradicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "needs to be eradicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that should be completely eliminated or removed, often in a serious context such as social issues or harmful practices. Example: "The misinformation spreading online needs to be eradicated to ensure a well-informed public."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

Racing's reformists have rightfully targeted steroid abuse as a problem that needs to be eradicated.

The New York Times

"His crimes reflect a virus in our business culture that needs to be eradicated".

The New York Times

The casualisation and agency work in catering, cleaning, security or anywhere else needs to be eradicated, and for good measure, a living wage introduced unilaterally.

The Guardian

"There has to be wide-scale acknowledgment that regulatory capture exists, dominates our system and needs to be eradicated," Mr. Barofsky said in the interview.

The New York Times

The policy, she said, needs to be eradicated completely, insisting there is "no room for such rules in this day and age - across any sector".

Independent

As the level of automation is likely to increase in future designs, extending to smaller aircraft and to different kinds of operation, the consequences of the pilot 'fighting' the FCS system and inducing A/RPCs needs to be eradicated.

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Muslims need to be eradicated.

The Guardian - Tech

Both needed to be eradicated from Germany.

The Guardian - Books

But surprises such as the scale of the Europe first half miss need to be eradicated.

The Guardian - Business

Does poverty itself need to be eradicated, or can its effects on children somehow be counteracted?

The New York Times - Magazine

"Our concern is they were promoting the idea that gun ownership was a disease that needed to be eradicated".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase “needs to be eradicated”, ensure the context clearly justifies the strong implication of complete removal. Avoid using it for trivial issues.

Common error

Avoid using “needs to be eradicated” in casual conversation or informal writing. The phrase carries a weight of seriousness and is more appropriate for formal discussions about significant problems.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needs to be eradicated" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing necessity. It indicates that a particular issue or problem requires complete removal or elimination. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this expression is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "needs to be eradicated" is a modal verb phrase that indicates a strong necessity for complete removal or elimination. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It's frequently used in news and media, science, and encyclopedias, carrying a neutral formality. When using this phrase, ensure the context justifies the strong implication of complete removal and avoid overuse in informal settings. Alternatives like “"must be eliminated"” and “"should be abolished"” can provide similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis or formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must be eliminated

Implies a stronger obligation or requirement for removal compared to the original phrase.

should be abolished

Suggests formally ending a system, practice, or institution; carries a more official tone.

has to be removed

Indicates a practical necessity for removal, emphasizing the action rather than the desirability.

requires elimination

Focuses on the requirement or need for the process of eliminating something.

demands eradication

Emphasizes the urgency and importance of completely wiping something out.

needs to be stamped out

Suggests forceful suppression or elimination, often of something spreading or undesirable.

ought to be terminated

Implies a more formal and decisive ending or conclusion to something.

is imperative to extinguish

Highlights the critical need to put an end to something, often with a sense of urgency.

calls for obliteration

Indicates a need for complete destruction or removal, often used in more dramatic contexts.

warrants complete removal

Suggests that the situation justifies or necessitates a thorough removal.

FAQs

How to use “needs to be eradicated” in a sentence?

This phrase is used to express that something must be completely removed or eliminated. For example: "Racism in schools "needs to be eradicated"." Use it when discussing serious problems or issues.

What can I say instead of “needs to be eradicated”?

You can use alternatives like “"must be eliminated"”, “"should be abolished"”, or “"has to be removed"” depending on the context.

Which is correct, “needs to be eradicated” or “needs eradication”?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. “Needs to be eradicated” emphasizes the process of removal, while “needs eradication” focuses on the state of requiring removal. The choice depends on the desired emphasis.

What's the difference between “needs to be eradicated” and “needs to be addressed”?

“"Needs to be addressed"” implies that a problem requires attention and action, but not necessarily complete removal. “Needs to be eradicated” suggests that the problem must be completely eliminated or destroyed. The choice depends on the severity and nature of the issue.