has to be removed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has to be removed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something needs to be removed or taken away from a given situation. For example, "The old paint on the walls has to be removed before the new colors can be applied."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The donated kidney has to be removed.

The New Yorker

The emotion, he said, has to be removed.

The Guardian - Sport

General Boykin has to be removed from his current job.

The New York Times

Dr. Klutchmaw says it has to be removed.

The New Yorker

This layer has to be removed before vigorous combustion can start.

Combustion and Flame

Restaurants produce a considerable amount of wastewater that has to be removed.

World Pumps

This residual heat has to be removed from the core sufficiently.

Applied Thermal Engineering

"If a bridge is not being used, it has to be removed".

The New York Times

This threat has to be removed from the team because it is not productive".

The Guardian - Sport

If only one testis is involved, only it has to be removed.

The New York Times - Health

On the other hand, not all mold is dangerous and has to be removed".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has to be removed", ensure the subject is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what "has to be removed" and from where.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice constructions like "has to be removed" when an active voice construction would be more direct and impactful. Instead of "The error has to be removed", consider "You must remove the error".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has to be removed" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating that an action (removal) is necessary or obligatory. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, providing numerous examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

49%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has to be removed" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to indicate a necessary or mandatory action of removal. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase appears frequently in various contexts, including science, news, and formal communication. When using "has to be removed", ensure clarity by specifying the subject and consider whether an active voice construction might be more impactful. Common alternatives include "needs to be eliminated" and "must be taken away". Overall, this phrase is a reliable tool for conveying the necessity of removal in a clear and concise manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is essential to eliminate

Emphasizes the importance of the elimination.

needs to be eliminated

Emphasizes complete removal or eradication.

is imperative to discard

Highlights the urgency and necessity of discarding something.

must be taken away

Focuses on the action of taking something away.

is crucial to extract

Emphasizes the critical nature of extracting something.

is required to be cleared

Highlights the requirement for something to be cleared.

ought to be detached

Focuses on the separation and removal of something.

should be extracted

Implies a more careful or precise removal.

is vital to eradicate

Highlights the life-or-death importance of eradication.

demands to be purged

Suggests a more forceful or thorough cleansing.

FAQs

How can I use "has to be removed" in a sentence?

Use "has to be removed" to indicate a mandatory action of taking something away. For instance, "The damaged component /s/has+to+be+removed/ before the machine can function properly."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "has to be removed"?

You can use alternatives like "needs to be eliminated", "must be taken away", or "is required to be cleared", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "has to be removed" or an active voice construction?

While "has to be removed" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "The obstacle has to be removed", consider "Someone must remove the obstacle".

What's the difference between "has to be removed" and "should be removed"?

"Has to be removed" implies a mandatory requirement, whereas "should be removed" suggests a recommendation or best practice. The former indicates that removal is essential, while the latter indicates that removal is advisable but not strictly necessary.