Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
We performed five cross-validation tests in five species: rat, mouse, human, fruit fly and nematode.
The positive dataset consists of known piRNA sequences of five species: rat, mouse, human, fruit fly and nematode.
Here, we used all the 1364 1 5 nt strings and an improved Fisher Discriminant algorithm to characterize piRNA sequences in five model species: rat, mouse, human, fruit fly and nematode.
Results: In this article, a k-mer scheme is proposed to identify piRNA sequences, relying on the training sets from non-piRNA and piRNA sequences of five model species sequenced: rat, mouse, human, fruit fly and nematode.
The same trend has been found in mouse, human, fruit fly, Arabidopsis, malaria, and fission yeast: shorter Open Reading Frames (ORFs) tend to exhibit more densely packed ribosomes (Cataldo et al. 1999; Branco-Price et al. 2005; Lackner et al. 2007; Qin et al. 2007; Hendrickson et al. 2009; Ingolia et al. 2009; Lacsina et al. 2011).
Similar(55)
Initial genome-wide investigations using microarrays in established model organisms such as mouse, humans, fruit flies, and nematodes all male heterogametic species yielded patterns consistent with global sex chromosome dosage compensation.
These cells have to digest food, take in nutrients, keep out pathogens, communicate with other organs, and respond swiftly to all sorts of stressors – all of these activities are shared between mouse, human and fruit fly.
38 The OR sequences from yeast, fruit fly, mouse, human, and worm were used for the uni- and cross-genomic OR sequence alignments.
Observe that some species (rat, cow, and sea urchin) have around 9% of their bases uncharacterized within large introns while other species (human, mouse, and fruit fly) have almost no uncharacterized bases.
Currently, respective all-against-all associations are available for five species: human, mouse, worm, fruit fly and yeast.
The coordinated expression of clustered miRNAs has been described earlier in human, mouse and fruit fly [ 9- 12].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com