Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Among the morphological traits studied in this context, morphology affecting the degree of concealment of the female genitalia has not been considered.
Result of analysis of variance revealed significant differences among most of the morphological traits studied and the essential oil content in terms of genotype, cultivation year, and genotype × year interaction.
The morphological traits studied are primarily used for taxonomic purposes but they can still give important functional information for the evolution of the clownfishes.
We tested this hypothesis on the eight morphological traits studied and found that, on phylograms, they all evolved at higher rates in clownfishes than in damselfishes.
The morphological traits studied herein build on two previous studies, in which a landmark-based geometric morphometric characterization of various Tropheus populations was elaborated (Maderbacher et al., 2008; Herler et al., 2010).
The parent (MPS-36) was grouped in cluster I along with genotypes MPS-36 (1), MPS-36 (3), and MPS-36 (5), which indicates that these genotypes are closer to parent with respect to morphological traits studied.
Similar(54)
At physiological maturity, the following morphological traits were studied in case of N22 and NH219, viz., plant height (length of the tallest tiller upto tip of panicle in cm), number of tillers, number of panicles (number of panicles with seeds exceeding 15%), length of panicle (length from neck to last spikelet of main panicle in cm), and yield/plant (mean weight of filled seeds from 22 plants).
Neither the degree of morphological integration of the traits studied, nor the ranks of P, indicated greater evolutionary constraint at range edges.
As expected from the results of previous studies [28], [30], we observed temporal clines in the morphological traits under study.
The decreasing trend of all studied morphological traits was linear (Table 2).
Among the more recent, O rdas et al. (2008) studied morphological traits and flowering time in maize.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com