Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
For data presentation, the more conservative p value was selected.
This more conservative p value was employed to minimize false positive responses.
In addition, we report the data for a more conservative P SVM cutoff of 0.9.
To control for multiple comparisons, a more conservative p value of 0.01 was selected for use in the multivariate analyses.
Given the multiple tests performed in this study, a more conservative P value ≤0.001 is considered significant herein.
However, setting s = 100 and B = 100 yields the same number of null statistics; this configuration would lead to a savings in computational time while it may result in slightly more conservative P values.
Similar(52)
We used the more conservative p-value of less than 0.001 as a cut-off for statistical significance in the logic analysis.
For these 5 polymorphisms, random effects calculations incorporating between-study heterogeneity revealed more conservative p-values for the summary effects compared with the fixed effects calculations.
For m > 100, SaddleSum gives more conservative P-values for terms with large sums of weights (Supplementary Figs S1 and S2).
For the multiple correlations and comparisons between the patient self-reported and parent proxy-reported HRQoL scores, a more conservative p-value of < 0.01 was considered significant, so as to reduce the risk of a Type I error (α = 0.01).
This kind of background choice was motivated by the fact that it tends to produce more conservative P-values and, in fact, a general guideline for the enrichment analysis is to use a narrowed-down list of genes instead of all genes in the genome (Huang da et al., 2009a, b).
Related(20)
more modest p
more moderate p
more conservative pp
more conservative features
more conservative frequencies
more conservative compared
more consistent p
more aware p
more dorsiflexed p
more evident p
more everted p
more dissatisfied p
more likely p
more intense p
more abundant p
more painful p
more prevalent p
more hopeless p
more garlic p
more dominant p
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com