Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Women also judged the spiciness of the cinnamon candy more intense (P = 0.001) than men, but sucralose intensity and odor ratings did not differ between sexes.
Patients with BTCP had more intense (P < 0.001) and more frequent (P < 0.01) background pain than patients without BTCP.
Similar(57)
Tourniquet pain was more intense in Group P (P = 0.036).
In this case, the signal rate associated to double protein activation (rDA) dominates for high concentrations of inactive protein P whereas single activation is more intense for low P values.
Other differences observed in both samples regarded an ion signal at 13006 Th being much more intense in female (P = 3.9×10−4 in sample B).
Children rated all concentrations as significantly more intense than adults (P < 0.001 for all).
Children (<18 years; N = 180) rated all concentrations as more intense than adults (P < 0.001 for all).
In high frequency (reverse digit span) where the mental task is more demanding, difference in memory performance between controls and dyslexics is more intense (t-test, p = 0.084) but it does not achieve statistical significance.
Children also rated the taste of the sucralose strip (37.9±1.9mm vs. 27.8±0.9mm), the spiciness of the cinnamon candy (61.8±2.4mm vs. 39.8±1.2mm), and the odor of the spearmint extract (76.3±1.5mm vs. 68.5±0.8mm) as significantly more intense than adults (P < 0.001 for all), and children rated the spiciness of the cinnamon candy as significantly higher than that of the highest LA strip (P < 0.001).
The unglycosylated fragment appeared as a doublet with a distinct upper and lower band and the relative intensity of the 2 bands varying with mouse Prn-p genotype; the lower band appeared more intense in Prn-p a mice and the higher band more intense in Prn-p b mice.
Immunohistochemistry analysis showed a more intense signal for p-AKT in C4-HI tumors (Figure 1B), confirming western blots results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com