Ai Feedback
Exact(9)
The concentrations of these molecules were estimated by the formula of Duxbury and Yentsch (1956).
Values of optical film thickness (dopt) of adsorbed DNA molecules were estimated by using SPR measurements.
Based on the predicted excess molar enthalpies (HEm) from the COSMO-RS, the interactions between all constituent pairs of molecules were estimated.
Subjects and methods: Soluble molecules were estimated in 35 healthy, appropriate for gestational age, full-term neonates, their mothers and in 25 healthy, nonpregnant women, age-matched to the mothers (controls), using enzyme immunoassays.
Sizes of csRNA molecules were estimated using oligo-nucleotide DNA/RNA sense-probes with sequences same with csRNAs.
In previous studies, similarities of evolutionary histories between two molecules were estimated based on evolutionary distances across different species or namely phylogenetic trees.
Similar(51)
The current chemical space of known small molecules is estimated to exceed 1060 structures.
Specific fluorophilicity values of target molecules are estimated using a 2D method and compared with experimentally determined ones.
The bioactivity of the newly generated molecules is estimated by ligand efficiency rather than a commonly used scoring function.
The electron electron interactions of the molecules are estimated with GGA through Perdew–Burke Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange correlation [12, 13].
The solubility of these molecules was estimated using ideal solution theory, the Hildebrand equation, and UNIQUAC method.
Related(20)
particles were estimated
genes were estimated
medications were estimated
models were estimated
composites were estimated
compounds were estimated
sequences were estimated
elements were estimated
pathways were estimated
atoms were estimated
species were estimated
molecules were designed
molecules were compared
molecules were considered
molecules were collected
molecules were synthesized
molecules were chosen
molecules were selected
molecules were expressed
molecules were shown
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com