Sentence examples for metric with different from inspiring English sources

As the focus of the article is the comparison of the proposed metric with different existing utility-based scheduling metrics, several simplistic assumptions regarding propagation characteristics, channel model, user distribution or path loss exponent were made.

Figure 13 The UE TP CDFs for Taguchi's method using Γ AM w 1, w 2, w 3 as the performance metric with different weights in suburban scenario.

First, we analyzed the character of the proposed metric with different candidate-block sizes and different numbers of the correspondence blocks.

Figure 9 shows the stability of ingredient and recipe preferences during the course of a week using the RBO metric with different top weightiness (i.e., p-values).

Figure 14 The convergence of Taguchi's method and simulated annealing using Γ AM w 1, w 2, w 3 as the performance metric with different weights in suburban scenario.

For example, the sparsity of the dispersive channel is about 0.4, and a heuristic implementation that works pretty well in the simulations is begin{array}rcl@ mathrm{F}left left|hat{h}_{l}right|right)=frac{left|hat{h}_{l}right|}{left|hat{h}_{l}right|+text{max}{hat{epsilon}(n -0.4,epsilon_{text{min}}}sigma_{text{max}}}, en -0.4,epsilon_{text{min}eighted metric with different σ parameters.

Besides, there are many results as regards fixed point theorems for multi-valued mappings in metric spaces with different contractive conditions and applications.

This effect is greater at lower metric resolutions because the interpolation function has less knots (i.e., less key-poses) which increase the variation of the synthesized motion trajectories among metric cycles with different lengths.

All these findings raise the speculation that the representation of past and future, as well as the representation of short and long time intervals, follow a metric dimension with different spatial compression factors.

Although Trahms et al. (2013) already offer a more detailed metric with seven different turnaround outcomes, their operationalization remains unclear.

For that purpose, we compare metric variations along with different throughputs ranged from 1386 to 4158 Mbps.