Sentence examples for methodological flaws are from inspiring English sources

Furthermore recurrent methodological flaws are encountered.

When results run counter to the researchers' expectations, methodological flaws are usually examined.

This will ensure that significant methodological flaws are not missed, and results of reviews are interpreted appropriately.

But when the results are in line with expectations, methodological flaws are more likely to be overlooked.

Some of the specific methodological flaws are associated with lack of adequate reporting of randomization, inadequate sample sizes to detect real differences in outcomes, high attrition rates and lack of blinding in assessments [ 24].

Others disagreed, saying that if methodological flaws were found after testing, it could be too late to get crucial information or interpret the findings.

Methodological flaws were identified, which complicated interpretation and limited conclusions; hence, recommendations for future research are suggested.

Caution is urged when interpreting this finding as major methodological flaws were identified in previous evaluation studies, including: no control group; non-random group assignment; failure to control or measure confounding variables; and poor program design.

Most frequent methodological flaws were high risk of selection and confounding bias.

The most prevalent methodological flaws were shortcomings in randomization, treatment allocation, groups at baseline, and compliance.

The most frequent methodological flaws were the lack of a suitable control group, randomisation (including allocation concealment), and blinding of participants and those involved in the treatment.