Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Thus, the quality of these reviews is sometimes put into question as methodological mistakes are frequently seen.
For instance, some methodological mistakes are continually repeated in published papers and proposals that referees fail to detect or do not consider properly, and because of this, both the development of reporting guidelines [7] [11] and the suggestion of adding methodological experts to the referees panel have been promoted [12] and implemented [13].
Similar(58)
By integrating the recommendations early in the life cycle of the study, many methodological mistakes can be avoided that inevitably lead to unsatisfactory reporting, and will ultimately result in higher value of the study.
Mistakes are mistakes.
"The mistakes are simple.
Statistical mistakes are widespread.
Common corrosion mistakes are listed.
Mistakes are important in learning.
Mistakes are allowed.
Occasional mistakes are quickly corrected.
These mistakes are rectified here.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com